The Guidelines Subcommittee (chaired by the Honourable Justice B Doyle) has delivered the Legal Profession Respectful Behaviour Guidelines, addressing bullying and other unacceptable disrespectful conduct in the courtroom.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- It is an appropriate time to retire.\nI express my deep gratitude to those judicial officers of this State who, through their diligent and conscientious commitment to the administration of justice, have lightened my burden.
\nI also thank the Executive leadership and all other staff of the Courts Administration Authority for their dedicated and exemplary support of the judiciary and their service to our community.
\nThe post Statement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis Chief Justice of South Australia appeared first on CAA.
\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nhttps://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/03/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator-2/\nSharon Moloney\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- Judges do not magically gain all the general knowledge, understanding and wisdom, [...]\nThe post Statement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia appeared first on CAA.
\n19 August 2025
\nRoyal Commission into Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence
\n
\nI welcome the publication of the Report of the Royal Commission into Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence.
\nI support the recommendation that a mandatory judicial education and training framework be implemented.
\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- The Report recommends the need for improved information provision to help victim survivors navigate the system, improvements to the operation and understanding of Intervention orders, enhanced training for staff and judiciary, expansion of the Abuse Prevention Program, new vulnerable witness suites outside of Court buildings, and developing and implementing minimum safety standards for Courts infrastructure.\nCouncil acknowledges the significant work to be done and is committed to working with the Government to implement these recommendations.
\n
\nReleased by CAA Media and Communications Officer phone 8204 0403 or 0467 795 291
\nThe post Statement from the State Courts Administration Council appeared first on \nThe post A statement from the State Courts Administrator appeared first on CAA.
\n
\nThe Public Service Association will hold a rally on Wednesday, 26 November at 12.30pm which will impact court operations.
\nPre-emptive actions have been taken by each Court, so any disruption is able to be managed with minimum risk to staff, judiciary and court users.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- [pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 4G\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORIGINATING APPLICATION EX PARTE – APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO\nPROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nApplicant\nFull Name\nName of responsible\nofficer If applicable Full Name\nResponsible officer details\nIf applicable\nRank/position Number/identifier\nName of law firm/solicitor\nIf any\nLaw Firm Responsible Solicitor\nAddress for service\nStreet Address (including unit or level number and name of property if required)\nCity/town/suburb State Postcode Country\nEmail address\nPhone Details\nType (eg. home; work; mobile) – Number Another number (optional)\nApplication Details\nThis Application is made under section 74BR of the Summary Offences Act 1953 in connection with a child\n Source: `strategies/Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 92AP\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORDER – TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nIntroduction\nHearing\nHearing Location: [location]\n[Hearing date]\n[name of judicial officer]\nAppearances\n[Applicant Appearance Information]\nRemarks\nThe Magistrate is satisfied that:\n(a) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that data held on a computer or data storage device, namely [describe\ndevice specifically or generically] (‘the Device’), may afford evidence of a child exploitation offence;\n(b) [Full Name of Specified Person], date of birth [date], (‘the Specified Person’) is:\n reasonably suspected of having committed a child exploitation offence in relation to which the order is sought.\n Source: `strategies/Form-92AP-Order---To-Provide-Information-or-Assistance-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat07-Final-order/Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf)`\n- [Page 2]\nForm 92AP\nOrder\nDate of Order: [date]\nTerms of Order\nPursuant to s 74BR(1) of the Summary Offences Act 1953, it is ordered that:\n1.\n Source: `strategies/Form-92AP-Order---To-Provide-Information-or-Assistance-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat07-Final-order/Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf)`\n- About the courts\nShon Ellerton\n2024-11-12T10:32:15+10:30\nOur courts\nFind out more about our courts here.\n Source: `pages/about.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/about-the-courts/)`\n\n## Key Issues, Risks, and Recommendations\n\n- They encourage practitioners and litigants to consider the use of AI ethically and responsibly.
\nThe Court envisages that AI, when used correctly, has the potential to change the way court cases are heard and determined in many ways, leading to cost savings and making access to justice more affordable for all.
\nHowever, in recognition of the risks associated with the use of AI in litigation, the guidelines provide practical guidance on how practitioners and litigants can ensure that they continue to meet their obligations.
\nThe Court has also prepared additional guidance for self-represented litigants to assist them in the use of AI.
\n\nCouncil acknowledges the significant work to be done and is committed to working with the Government to implement these recommendations.
\n
\nReleased by CAA Media and Communications Officer phone 8204 0403 or 0467 795 291
\nThe post Statement from the State Courts Administration Council appeared first on \nThe post A statement from the State Courts Administrator appeared first on CAA.
\n
\nThe Public Service Association will hold a rally on Wednesday, 26 November at 12.30pm which will impact court operations.
\nPre-emptive actions have been taken by each Court, so any disruption is able to be managed with minimum risk to staff, judiciary and court users.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- News\nLegal Profession Respectful Behaviours Guidelines\nSharon Moloney\n2026-02-26T09:56:56+10:30\nFebruary 26th, 2026\n|\nGeneral News\n|\nThe Respectful Behaviours Committee and the Heads of Jurisdiction have [...]\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nSharon Moloney\n2026-01-19T11:13:34+10:30\nJanuary 19th, 2026\n|\nMedia Releases\n|\nIn May 2025 the Chief Justice of South Australia [...]\nGuidelines concerning the use of Generative artificial intelligence in litigation in South Australian Courts\nSharon Moloney\n2026-01-22T14:11:58+10:30\nDecember 24th, 2025\n|\nGeneral News\n|\nThese guidelines apply to and in respect of steps taken [...]\n1\n2\nNext\n Source: `pages/homepage.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/)`\n- The Committee’s remit is to drive, develop and champion cultural [...]\nSharon Moloney\n2026-05-08T13:21:53+09:30\nMay 8th, 2026\n|\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nIn May 2025 the Chief Justice of South Australia launched a survey and invited submissions about the use of Generative AI (Gen AI) in Courts.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/)`\n- It does no more than allow lawyers and others to inform the court of the correct pronunciation of their name and their preferred gender [...]\nSharon Moloney\n2023-11-07T07:48:47+10:30\nNovember 6th, 2023\n|\nCourts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns\n1 November 2023 Courts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns The Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia, has today issued a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__01.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/page/2/)`\n- The progress was noted by the Respectful Behaviour Committee together with the observation that sustained ongoing effort is required from all leaders in the profession to embed a consistent cultural norm of respectful, appropriate behaviour.
\n
\nReleased by CAA Media and Communications Officer phone 8204 0403 or 0467 795 291
\nThe post Statement from the Honourable Chief Justice Stein appeared first on CAA.
\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nhttps://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2026/01/19/supreme-court-issues-guidelines-for-the-use-of-generative-ai/\nSharon Moloney\nMon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:55 +0000\nMedia Releases\nhttp://caawpa01.courts.sa.gov.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- It introduces measures to address changing security risks while minimising disruption.
\nThe post A statement from the State Courts Administrator appeared first on CAA.
\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nhttps://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/11/25/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator/\nSharon Moloney\nTue, 25 Nov 2025 08:46:09 +0000\nMedia Releases (exclude news)\nhttp://caawpa01.courts.sa.gov.au/caa/?p=25547\n The Public Service Association will hold a rally on Wednesday, 26 November at 12.30pm which will impact court operations.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- The Commission has highlighted the negative experiences [...]
\nThe post Statement from the State Courts Administration Council appeared first on CAA.
\n19 August 2025
\nThe State Courts Administration Council acknowledges the release of the Report from the Royal Commission into Domestic, Family, and Sexual Violence; With Courage: South Australia’s Vision Beyond Violence.
\nThis comprehensive report, spanning over 600 pages and containing 136 recommendations, reflects voices from across South Australia.
\nThe Commission has highlighted the negative experiences within the justice system and has provided numerous recommendations to improve the system and peoples experience of it.
\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- Released by CAA Media and Communications Officer phone 8204 0403 or 0467 795 291\nSharon Moloney\n2026-05-08T13:21:53+09:30\nMay 8th, 2026\n|\nRelated Posts\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nJanuary 19th, 2026\nStatement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis Chief Justice of South Australia\nDecember 16th, 2025\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nDecember 3rd, 2025\nCourt registry operating hours 24 December 2025 to 2 January\nNovember 12th, 2025\nStatement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia\nAugust 19th, 2025\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__11.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2026/05/08/statement-from-the-honourable-chief-justice-stein/)`\n- Sharon Moloney\n2025-12-16T09:01:51+10:30\nDecember 16th, 2025\n|\nRelated Posts\nStatement from the Honourable Chief Justice Stein\nMay 8th, 2026\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nJanuary 19th, 2026\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nDecember 3rd, 2025\nCourt registry operating hours 24 December 2025 to 2 January\nNovember 12th, 2025\nStatement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia\nAugust 19th, 2025\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__13.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/16/statement-from-the-honourable-chris-kourakis-chief-justice-of-south-australia-2/)`\n- Sharon Moloney\n2025-12-03T08:19:36+10:30\nDecember 3rd, 2025\n|\nRelated Posts\nStatement from the Honourable Chief Justice Stein\nMay 8th, 2026\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nJanuary 19th, 2026\nStatement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis Chief Justice of South Australia\nDecember 16th, 2025\nCourt registry operating hours 24 December 2025 to 2 January\nNovember 12th, 2025\nStatement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia\nAugust 19th, 2025\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__14.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/03/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator-2/)`\n- Sharon Moloney\n2025-12-03T08:06:18+10:30\nNovember 25th, 2025\n|\nRelated Posts\nCourt operating hours over Christmas holiday period\nNovember 5th, 2024\nStatutes Amendment (Attorney-General’s Portfolio) Bill 2024\nJune 25th, 2024\nStatement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia\nNovember 6th, 2023\nCourts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns\nNovember 1st, 2023\nCourt operating hours from 22 December 2023\nNovember 1st, 2023\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__15.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/11/25/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator/)`\n\n## Corporate Values and Operating Culture\n\n- News\nLegal Profession Respectful Behaviours Guidelines\nSharon Moloney\n2026-02-26T09:56:56+10:30\nFebruary 26th, 2026\n|\nGeneral News\n|\nThe Respectful Behaviours Committee and the Heads of Jurisdiction have [...]\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nSharon Moloney\n2026-01-19T11:13:34+10:30\nJanuary 19th, 2026\n|\nMedia Releases\n|\nIn May 2025 the Chief Justice of South Australia [...]\nGuidelines concerning the use of Generative artificial intelligence in litigation in South Australian Courts\nSharon Moloney\n2026-01-22T14:11:58+10:30\nDecember 24th, 2025\n|\nGeneral News\n|\nThese guidelines apply to and in respect of steps taken [...]\n1\n2\nNext\n Source: `pages/homepage.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/)`\n- News\ncaa_admin\n2021-11-23T09:27:26+10:30\n8\n05, 2026\nSharon Moloney\n2026-05-08T13:21:53+09:30\nStatement from the Honourable Chief Justice Stein\n8 May 2026 Yesterday, I chaired the first meeting for 2026 of the Respectful Behaviour Committee, attended by the Honourable Kyam Maher MLC, Deputy Premier [...]\n26\n02, 2026\nSharon Moloney\n2026-02-26T09:56:56+10:30\nLegal Profession Respectful Behaviours Guidelines\nThe Respectful Behaviours Committee and the Heads of Jurisdiction have endorsed the Legal Profession Respectful Behaviours Guidelines which address conduct in, or in connection with, [...]\n19\n01, 2026\nSharon Moloney\n2026-01-19T11:13:34+10:30\nSupreme Court issues guidelines for the use of Generative AI\nIn May 2025 the Chief Justice of South Australia launched a survey and invited submissions about the use of Generative AI (Gen AI) in [...]\n24\n12, 2025\nSharon Moloney\n Source: `pages/news-latest.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/news/)`\n- [pages 47,48,49]\noceeding is or may be finally determined;\ndocument— see definition in section 4 of the Legislation Interpretation Act 2021;\nElectronic System—see rule 13.5;\nemail service—see rule 42.2;\nenforcement process means—\n(a) an application for a summons, warrant or order; or\n(b) a summons, warrant or order,\nmade under or governed by Chapter 17 of these Rules;\nERD Court or Environment, Resources and Development Court means the\nEnvironment, Resources and Development Court of South Australia;\nevidentiary material means a document or thing of evidentiary value and includes a\ndocument or thing that the Court determines should be produced to determine whether\nit has evidentiary value;\nexcluded proceeding means—\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf)`\n- Part 3—Overarching obligations of parties and lawyers\n3.1—Overarching obligations\n(1) A party or a person appearing or required to appear before the Court must in relation\nto a proceeding or an appellate proceeding—\n(a) act honestly;\n(b) not engage in misleading conduct;\n(c) not take a step that is frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process;\n(d) not make an assertion or response to an assertion for which they do not, on the\nmaterial available at the time, have a proper basis;\n(e) not take a step unless they reasonably believe that it is necessary to facilitate the\nresolution or determination of the proceeding;\n(f) cooperate with the other parties and with the Court in relation to the conduct of\nthe proceeding;\n(g) use reasonable endeavours to resolve, or alternatively narrow the scope of, a\ndispute in or the subject of the proceeding by agreement;\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf)`\n- South Australia has a unique opportunity to provide a clear, consistent message about professional behavioural expectations and to establish a shared cultural norm.
\nThe Committee’s work is being progressed through the Respectful Behaviour Steering Committee which I chair, which has established three subcommittees to drive priority areas of work:
\n\n- The Training Subcommittee (chaired by the Honourable President Dolphin) is developing a proposal for professional development, including a practical training package with measurable outcomes.
\n- The Guidelines Subcommittee (chaired by the Honourable Justice B Doyle) has delivered the Legal Profession Respectful Behaviour Guidelines, addressing bullying and other unacceptable disrespectful conduct in the courtroom.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- It is an appropriate time to retire.
\nI express my deep gratitude to those judicial officers of this State who, through their diligent and conscientious commitment to the administration of justice, have lightened my burden.
\nI also thank the Executive leadership and all other staff of the Courts Administration Authority for their dedicated and exemplary support of the judiciary and their service to our community.
\nThe post Statement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis Chief Justice of South Australia appeared first on CAA.
\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nhttps://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/03/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator-2/\nSharon Moloney\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- This includes rescheduling court hearings to another date where required. [...]\nThe post A statement from the State Courts Administrator appeared first on CAA.
\n
\nThe Public Service Association will hold a rally on Wednesday, 26 November at 12.30pm which will impact court operations.
\nPre-emptive actions have been taken by each Court, so any disruption is able to be managed with minimum risk to staff, judiciary and court users.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)`\n- [pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 4G\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORIGINATING APPLICATION EX PARTE – APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO\nPROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nApplicant\nFull Name\nName of responsible\nofficer If applicable Full Name\nResponsible officer details\nIf applicable\nRank/position Number/identifier\nName of law firm/solicitor\nIf any\nLaw Firm Responsible Solicitor\nAddress for service\nStreet Address (including unit or level number and name of property if required)\nCity/town/suburb State Postcode Country\nEmail address\nPhone Details\nType (eg. home; work; mobile) – Number Another number (optional)\nApplication Details\nThis Application is made under section 74BR of the Summary Offences Act 1953 in connection with a child\n Source: `strategies/Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf)`\n\n## Global Ideas and Case Study Inputs\n\n_No global-intelligence source text found yet. Run `CLAUDE/global-ideas-scraper.py ` to populate case-study sources._\n\n## Source Artifacts Used\n\n- `strategies/Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.pdf` - strategies - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf\n- `strategies/Form-92AP-Order---To-Provide-Information-or-Assistance-to-Access-Data.pdf` - strategies - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat07-Final-order/Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf\n- `pages/about.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/about-the-courts/\n- `pages/contact.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/contact-us/\n- `pages/homepage.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/\n- `pages/media-releases-index.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__00.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__01.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/page/2/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__02.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__06.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/rules-forms-fees/ucr2020/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__07.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/rules-forms-fees/jcr2022/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__08.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/rules-forms-fees/ssr2022/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__09.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/24/guidelines-concerning-the-use-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-in-litigation-in-south-australian-courts\n- `pages/media-releases-index__10.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/rules-forms-fees/rules/first-nations-rules-and-forms/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__11.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2026/05/08/statement-from-the-honourable-chief-justice-stein/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__12.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2026/01/19/supreme-court-issues-guidelines-for-the-use-of-generative-ai/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__13.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/16/statement-from-the-honourable-chris-kourakis-chief-justice-of-south-australia-2/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__14.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/03/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator-2/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__15.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/11/25/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__16.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/11/12/court-registry-operating-hours-24-december-2025-to-2-january-2026/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__17.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/08/19/statement-from-the-honourable-chris-kourakis-chief-justice-of-south-australia/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__18.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/08/19/statement-from-the-state-courts-administration-council/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__19.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/08/12/statement-from-the-courts-administration-authority-state-courts-administrator/\n- `pages/media-releases-index__20.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/08/07/appointment-of-senior-counsel-5/\n- `pages/news-latest.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/news/\n- `pages/publications-index.html` - pages - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/publications/\n- `other-pdfs/Form-P1-Final-Notice.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/uniform-civil-rules/01-pre-action/Form P1 Final Notice.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/Modifications-to-Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Modifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020---History-of-Amendment.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020---Schedule-7---Modifications-to-Prescribed-Forms.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\n\n## Gaps To Fix\n\n- No corporate plan text source found.\n- No annual report text source found.\n- No global comparison/case-study sources found.",
"legislation_md": "# Courts Administration Authority - Acts and Legislation Discovery\n\n**Generated at**: 2026-05-09T21:42:18.756057+00:00\n**Entity ID**: S-SA-015\n**Jurisdiction**: South Australia\n**Portfolio**: Attorney-General\n\n> This is an evidence-based discovery list from scraped department material. A mention does not always mean the department administers the legislation; high-confidence and official register links should be reviewed.\n\n## Summary\n\n- Source files scanned: 31\n- Unique legislation references found: 97\n\n| Type | Count |\n|---|---:|\n| Act | 38 |\n| Rules | 59 |\n\n## Legislation References\n\n### Uniform Civil Rules 2020\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 247\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Uniform+Civil+Rules+2020\n\n**Sources**:\n- `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- `pages/media-releases-index__07.html`\n- `pages/media-releases-index__09.html`\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020---History-of-Amendment.pages.jsonl`\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020---Schedule-7---Modifications-to-Prescribed-Forms.pages.jsonl`\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- subsequent amendments as gazetted.\nRules\nUniform civil rules 2020\nTitle\nDownload\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 – History of Amendment\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.docx\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.pdf\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nUniform Civil Rules 2020.docx\nUniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nModifications to Prescribed Forms\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nRegistrar information und\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- tted.\nRules\nUniform civil rules 2020\nTitle\nDownload\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 – History of Amendment\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.docx\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.pdf\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nUniform Civil Rules 2020.docx\nUniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nModifications to Prescribed Forms\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 202\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- niform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nModifications to Prescribed Forms\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022\nFile\nAction\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- cribed Forms.pdf\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022\nFile\nAction\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.pdf\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022\nFile\nAction\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.pdf\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022 Youth Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022 Yout\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n\n### Magistrates Court Act 1991\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 31\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Magistrates+Court+Act+1991\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- ry 2025\n14 26 May 2025 12 June 2025, p.1412 1 July 2025\n15 22 September 2025 25 September 2025, p.3938 1 October 2025\n16 4 March 2026 12 March 2026, p.648 15 March 2026\nBy virtue and in pursuance of the Supreme Court Act 1935, the District Court Act\n1991, the Magistrates Court Act 1991, the Youth Court Act 1993, the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, the Local Government (Elections) Act\n1999, the First Nations Voice Act 2023 and all other enabling powers, we, the Chief\nJustice of the Supreme Court, the Chief Judge of the\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ppears—\nthe Act means—\n(a) in the context of or in respect of the Supreme Court—the Supreme Court Act\n1935;\n(b) in the context of or in respect of the District Court—the District Court Act 1991;\n(c) in the context of or in respect of the Magistrates Court—the Magistrates Court\nAct 1991;\n(d) in the context of or in respect of the Youth Court–the Youth Court Act 1993;\n(e) in the context of or in respect of the Environment, Resources and Development\nCourt—the Environment, Resources and Development Court Act 1993;\naction means any one of a clai\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- litigation guardian—see rule 23.6;\nLPEAC means the Legal Practitioners Education and Admission Council;\nMagistrate includes an auxiliary magistrate;\nminor civil action means a minor civil action in the Magistrates Court within the\nmeaning of section 3 of the Magistrates Court Act 1991;\nminor civil review means a review in the District Court of a minor civil action governed\nby section 38(6) to (9) of the Magistrates Court Act 1991;\nmonetary claim—see rule 142.1;\nmonetary judgment—see rule 201.1;\nnon-monetary judgment—see rule 201.1;\norigina\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ;\nminor civil action means a minor civil action in the Magistrates Court within the\nmeaning of section 3 of the Magistrates Court Act 1991;\nminor civil review means a review in the District Court of a minor civil action governed\nby section 38(6) to (9) of the Magistrates Court Act 1991;\nmonetary claim—see rule 142.1;\nmonetary judgment—see rule 201.1;\nnon-monetary judgment—see rule 201.1;\noriginal service—see rule 42.11;\noriginating application—see rule 51.3;\nOriginating Application—see rule 82.1;\nOriginating Application documents—see rule 8\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ginal jurisdiction—Magistrates Court\n(1) The jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court, except the jurisdiction to hear a contempt\ncharge or when a statute otherwise provides, may be exercised by a Judicial Registrar\nin all proceedings.\nNote—\nSection 7A(2) of the Magistrates Court Act 1991 provides that the Court may be constituted of\na special justice in defined cases, including if there is no Magistrate or Judicial Registrar\navailable.\n(2) The jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court—\n(a) to tax costs under Chapter 16 Part 5 may be exercised by\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### District Court Act 1991\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 19\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=District+Court+Act+1991\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- ecember 2024, p. 4820 1 January 2025\n14 26 May 2025 12 June 2025, p.1412 1 July 2025\n15 22 September 2025 25 September 2025, p.3938 1 October 2025\n16 4 March 2026 12 March 2026, p.648 15 March 2026\nBy virtue and in pursuance of the Supreme Court Act 1935, the District Court Act\n1991, the Magistrates Court Act 1991, the Youth Court Act 1993, the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, the Local Government (Elections) Act\n1999, the First Nations Voice Act 2023 and all other enabling powers, we, the Chief\nJustice of the Supre\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- Part 2—Interpretation\n2.1—Definitions\n(1) In these Rules, unless the contrary intention appears—\nthe Act means—\n(a) in the context of or in respect of the Supreme Court—the Supreme Court Act\n1935;\n(b) in the context of or in respect of the District Court—the District Court Act 1991;\n(c) in the context of or in respect of the Magistrates Court—the Magistrates Court\nAct 1991;\n(d) in the context of or in respect of the Youth Court–the Youth Court Act 1993;\n(e) in the context of or in respect of the Environment, Resources and Development\nCo\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- Associate Judge or\nJudicial Registrar in all proceedings, except that a trial of a claim can only be heard\nand determined by an Associate Judge or Judicial Registrar if—\n(a) the Chief Judge so directs; or\n(b) all parties consent.\nNote—\nSection 20(1)(b) of the District Court Act 1991 provides that, subject to that section, if a matter\nlies within a jurisdiction of the Court conferred by any statute or the rules on Associate Judges,\nthe Court may be constituted of an Associate Judge. Section 51(1)(b) empowers the Court to\nmake rules author\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ding or class of proceedings if the Chief Judge so directs;\n(b) to make orders under the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 may be exercised\nby a Registrar; or\n(c) to make orders or judgments by consent may be exercised by a Registrar.\nNotes—\nSection 51 of the District Court Act 1991 authorises the making of rules regulating the business\nof the Court and the duties of the various officers of the Court and regulating costs.\nSection 18(1) of the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 provides that a court may, by its rules,\ndelegate any of its p\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ised by\nthe expert.\nNotes—\nSection 71 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 provides that the Court may in any matter call in the\naid of one or more assessors and try and hear such matter wholly or partially with the assistance\nof such assessors. Section 20(4) of the District Court Act 1991 and section 7B of the Magistrates\nCourt Act 1991 address the appointment of assessors when an Act conferring jurisdiction\nprovides that the Court is to sit with assessors in exercising that jurisdiction.\nSection 66 of the Supreme Court Act 1935, section 33 of\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Supreme Court Act 1935\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 18\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Supreme+Court+Act+1935\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- 2024\n13 2 December 2024 18 December 2024, p. 4820 1 January 2025\n14 26 May 2025 12 June 2025, p.1412 1 July 2025\n15 22 September 2025 25 September 2025, p.3938 1 October 2025\n16 4 March 2026 12 March 2026, p.648 15 March 2026\nBy virtue and in pursuance of the Supreme Court Act 1935, the District Court Act\n1991, the Magistrates Court Act 1991, the Youth Court Act 1993, the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, the Local Government (Elections) Act\n1999, the First Nations Voice Act 2023 and all other enabling powers, we, t\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- s nominee).\n(4) The Registrar must publish all practice directions on the CAA website.\nPart 2—Interpretation\n2.1—Definitions\n(1) In these Rules, unless the contrary intention appears—\nthe Act means—\n(a) in the context of or in respect of the Supreme Court—the Supreme Court Act\n1935;\n(b) in the context of or in respect of the District Court—the District Court Act 1991;\n(c) in the context of or in respect of the Magistrates Court—the Magistrates Court\nAct 1991;\n(d) in the context of or in respect of the Youth Court–the Youth Court Act 199\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- of Disputed Returns as\napplicable and, when the context indicates, means a judicial officer having power to\nact in the manner the subject of the relevant provision of these Rules;\nthe Court of Appeal means the Court of Appeal as defined in section 5(1) of the\nSupreme Court Act 1935;\ncourt officer means a judicial officer or a non-judicial officer of the Court;\ncross appeal—see rule 211.1;\ncross claim means a claim in which an existing party seeks final relief from the Court\nagainst another existing party or a person who is not an existi\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- o 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 57]\n15\nChapter 2—The Court\nPart 1—Jurisdiction\nNote—\nThis Part addresses original jurisdiction. Appellate jurisdiction is addressed in Chapter 18.\n11.1—Original jurisdiction—Supreme Court\n(1) Subject to section 48(2)(a) of the Supreme Court Act 1935 and these Rules, the\njurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be exercised by a Judge in all proceedings.\n(2) The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court exercisable by a Judge, except the jurisdiction\nto hear a contempt charge or when a statute otherwise provides, ma\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- sociate Justice or Judicial Registrar in all proceedings, except that a trial of a\nclaim can only be heard and determined by an Associate Justice or Judicial Registrar\nif—\n(a) the Chief Justice so directs; or\n(b) all parties consent.\nNote—\nSection 7(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1935 provides that, subject to any statute, the Associate\nJustices and judicial registrars have the power, authority and jurisdiction conferred on them\nunder any statute and under the rules of court. Section 48(2)(c) provides that the jurisdiction\nvested in the co\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Service and Execution of Process Act 1992\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 12\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Service+and+Execution+of+Process+Act+1992\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- their parent\nor guardian.\n3 Company served in South Document is served in accordance with\nAustralia or New Zealand section 109X of the Corporations Act\n2001 (Cth).\n4 Company served Document is served in accordance with\nelsewhere in Australia section 9 of the Service and Execution of\nProcess Act 1992 (Cth).\n5 Registered body served in Document is served in accordance with\nSouth Australia or New section 601CX of the Corporations Act\nZealand 2001 (Cth).\n6 Registered body served Document is served in accordance with\nelsewhere in Australia section 9 of the Se\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- 92 (Cth).\n5 Registered body served in Document is served in accordance with\nSouth Australia or New section 601CX of the Corporations Act\nZealand 2001 (Cth).\n6 Registered body served Document is served in accordance with\nelsewhere in Australia section 9 of the Service and Execution of\nProcess Act 1992 (Cth).\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 105]\n63\nTypes of service (cont.)\nItem Type of person Method of service\n7 Other body corporate Document is left at or sent by prepaid post\nserved in Sou\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ule 42.8 or rule 42.9.\n(4) Claim documents will be regarded as having been served on a party in accordance with\nthis rule if rule 42.10 applies.\nNotes—\nService of Claim documents in another State is effective only if there is compliance with section\n16 of the Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth).\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 133]\n91\nClaim documents served in New Zealand must contain or be accompanied by the information\ncontained in section 11 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ng Application documents will be regarded as having been served on a party\nin accordance with this rule if rule 42.10 applies.\nNotes—\nService of Originating Application documents in another State is effective only if there is\ncompliance with section 16 of the Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth).\nOriginating Application documents served in New Zealand must contain or be accompanied by\nthe information contained in section 11 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth).\n82.5—Absence of service\n(1) If the Originating Documents have not been ser\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- reasonable grounds to suspect that the action has been brought for an\nulterior purpose;\n(d) the order is authorised by statute; or\n(e) the order is necessary in the interests of justice.\nNote—\nSection 1335 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), section 19 of the Service and Execution of\nProcess Act 1992 (Cth) and section 15 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth)\nempower the Court to order security for costs in defined circumstances.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 185]\n143\n(2) The C\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Environment, Resources and Development Court Act 1993\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 11\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Environment%2C+Resources+and+Development+Court+Act+1993\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- 22 September 2025 25 September 2025, p.3938 1 October 2025\n16 4 March 2026 12 March 2026, p.648 15 March 2026\nBy virtue and in pursuance of the Supreme Court Act 1935, the District Court Act\n1991, the Magistrates Court Act 1991, the Youth Court Act 1993, the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, the Local Government (Elections) Act\n1999, the First Nations Voice Act 2023 and all other enabling powers, we, the Chief\nJustice of the Supreme Court, the Chief Judge of the District Court (in respect of\nthe District Court and the Court of Disputed Returns),\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- the context of or in respect of the Magistrates Court—the Magistrates Court\nAct 1991;\n(d) in the context of or in respect of the Youth Court–the Youth Court Act 1993;\n(e) in the context of or in respect of the Environment, Resources and Development\nCourt—the Environment, Resources and Development Court Act 1993;\naction means any one of a claim, cross claim or originating application;\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 46]\n4\naddress for service—see rule 44.1;\nalternative dispute resolution process mean\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- de an order for costs against a party, tax the costs to be\npaid pursuant to such order;\n(f) order any party to a proceeding before the Court to give security for the payment\nof costs or make any other order in relation thereto or pursuant to section 39 of\nthe Environment, Resources and Development Court Act 1993;\n(g) make an order remitting or reducing any court fees to be paid by a party in\naccordance with subsection 45(2) of the Environment, Resources and\nDevelopment Court Act 1993;\n(h) preside at a conference conducted pursuant to section 16 of the Environment,\nRe\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- f costs or make any other order in relation thereto or pursuant to section 39 of\nthe Environment, Resources and Development Court Act 1993;\n(g) make an order remitting or reducing any court fees to be paid by a party in\naccordance with subsection 45(2) of the Environment, Resources and\nDevelopment Court Act 1993;\n(h) preside at a conference conducted pursuant to section 16 of the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, and may, whilst so presiding, refer\nany questions of law to a Judge of the Court for determination;\n(i) adjourn any matter set for hear\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- Court Act 1993;\n(g) make an order remitting or reducing any court fees to be paid by a party in\naccordance with subsection 45(2) of the Environment, Resources and\nDevelopment Court Act 1993;\n(h) preside at a conference conducted pursuant to section 16 of the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, and may, whilst so presiding, refer\nany questions of law to a Judge of the Court for determination;\n(i) adjourn any matter set for hearing or list any matter for hearing, including\nmaking an order for the early hearing of any matter;\n(j) settle an order of t\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Joint Criminal Rules 2022\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 10\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Joint+Criminal+Rules+2022\n\n**Sources**:\n- `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- `pages/media-releases-index__07.html`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- odifications to Prescribed Forms\nUniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020\nModifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022\nFile\nAction\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magis\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- s 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar and Principal Registrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.pdf\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022 Youth Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022 Youth Court.pdf\nDownload\nForms\n01 - Pre Action (Forms P1 - P4)\nTitle\nDownload\nForm P1 Final Notice\nForm P1 Final Notice.docx\nForm P1 Final Notice.\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- r the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Supreme, District and Magistrates Court.pdf\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022 Youth Court.docx\nDownload\nRegistrar information under the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 and Joint Criminal Rules 2022 Youth Court.pdf\nDownload\nForms\n01 - Pre Action (Forms P1 - P4)\nTitle\nDownload\nForm P1 Final Notice\nForm P1 Final Notice.docx\nForm P1 Final Notice.pdf\nForm P2 Enforceable Payment Agreement\nForm P2 Enforceable Payment Agreement.docx\nForm P2 Enforceable Payment\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__06.html`\n- Joint Criminal Rules 2022 - CAA\n\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022\nRichard White\n2026-04-22T15:00:21+09:30\nThese compilations provide access to all Rules, Supplementary Rules and Forms. The compilations have been prepared by Court staff but DO NOT constitute an official publication thereof. F\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__07.html`\n- equent amendments as gazetted.\nRules\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022\nTitle\nDownload\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022 – History of Amendment\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.docx\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.pdf\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022.docx\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022.pdf\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022 – Schedule 2 – Modifications to Forms\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022 - Schedule 2 - Modifications to Forms.docx\nJoint Criminal Rules 2022 - Schedule 2 - Modifications to Forms.pdf\nRegistrar information u\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__07.html`\n\n### Legislation Interpretation Act 2021\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 9\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Legislation+Interpretation+Act+2021\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- ese\nRules provide for a longer time).\n1.5—Object\nThe object of these Rules is to facilitate the just, efficient, timely, cost-effective and\nproportionate resolution or determination of the issues in proceedings governed by these\nRules.\nNotes—\nSection 3 of the Legislation Interpretation Act 2021 generally applies the provisions of the\nAct to “legislative instruments”.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 45]\n3\nThese Rules are a “legislative instrument” within the meaning of the Legislati\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- Act 2021 generally applies the provisions of the\nAct to “legislative instruments”.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 45]\n3\nThese Rules are a “legislative instrument” within the meaning of the Legislation\nInterpretation Act 2021.\nSection 14 of the Legislation Interpretation Act 2021 provides that, in interpreting a provision\nof an Act or a legislative instrument, the interpretation that best achieves the purpose or object\nof the Act or the instrument (whether or not that purpose or o\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- o “legislative instruments”.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 45]\n3\nThese Rules are a “legislative instrument” within the meaning of the Legislation\nInterpretation Act 2021.\nSection 14 of the Legislation Interpretation Act 2021 provides that, in interpreting a provision\nof an Act or a legislative instrument, the interpretation that best achieves the purpose or object\nof the Act or the instrument (whether or not that purpose or object is expressly stated in the Act\nor instrument) is\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- 1987\nand counterpart legislation of the other States and the Commonwealth;\ndirections hearing means any hearing in a proceeding other than a trial or hearing at\nwhich the proceeding is or may be finally determined;\ndocument— see definition in section 4 of the Legislation Interpretation Act 2021;\nElectronic System—see rule 13.5;\nemail service—see rule 42.2;\nenforcement process means—\n(a) an application for a summons, warrant or order; or\n(b) a summons, warrant or order,\nmade under or governed by Chapter 17 of these Rules;\nERD Court or Environment, Re\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- 2\nand, unless the context otherwise indicates, includes a short form statement of claim\nand a statement of cross claim;\nstatement of cross claim means a statement of cross claim as described in rule 65.3;\nstatute includes—\n(a) an Act within the meaning of the Legislation Interpretation Act 2021 and, where\napplicable, legislation of another polity that would be an Act if made in or under\nthe laws of South Australia;\n(b) a statutory instrument within the meaning of the Legislation Interpretation Act\n2021 and, where applicable, an instrument of another\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Youth Court Act 1993\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 9\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Youth+Court+Act+1993\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- 025, p.1412 1 July 2025\n15 22 September 2025 25 September 2025, p.3938 1 October 2025\n16 4 March 2026 12 March 2026, p.648 15 March 2026\nBy virtue and in pursuance of the Supreme Court Act 1935, the District Court Act\n1991, the Magistrates Court Act 1991, the Youth Court Act 1993, the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993, the Local Government (Elections) Act\n1999, the First Nations Voice Act 2023 and all other enabling powers, we, the Chief\nJustice of the Supreme Court, the Chief Judge of the District Court (in respec\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- reme Court Act\n1935;\n(b) in the context of or in respect of the District Court—the District Court Act 1991;\n(c) in the context of or in respect of the Magistrates Court—the Magistrates Court\nAct 1991;\n(d) in the context of or in respect of the Youth Court–the Youth Court Act 1993;\n(e) in the context of or in respect of the Environment, Resources and Development\nCourt—the Environment, Resources and Development Court Act 1993;\naction means any one of a claim, cross claim or originating application;\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- Court.\n11.4—Original jurisdiction—Youth Court\nThe jurisdiction of the Youth Court, except the jurisdiction to hear a contempt charge or\nwhen a statute otherwise provides, may be exercised by a Judicial Registrar in all\nproceedings.\nNote—\nSection 15(1) of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that, subject to the Act, the Court, when\nsitting to adjudicate on any matter, must be constituted of the Judge of the Court, a Magistrate\nor a Judicial Registrar.\nSection 10C of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that judicial registrars may exercise\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- in all\nproceedings.\nNote—\nSection 15(1) of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that, subject to the Act, the Court, when\nsitting to adjudicate on any matter, must be constituted of the Judge of the Court, a Magistrate\nor a Judicial Registrar.\nSection 10C of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that judicial registrars may exercise such\njurisdiction of the Court as assigned by the Judge of the Court or the rules.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 60]\n18\nSection 14(7) of the\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- provides that judicial registrars may exercise such\njurisdiction of the Court as assigned by the Judge of the Court or the rules.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 60]\n18\nSection 14(7) of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that a registrar may issue summonses and\nwarrants on behalf of the Court; adjourn proceedings or exercise any procedural or non-judicial\npowers assigned by the rules.\n11.5—Original jurisdiction—ERD Court\n(1) In addition to any other powers conferred\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 6\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Enforcement+of+Judgments+Act+1991\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- in a\nproceeding or class of proceedings if the Chief Justice so directs;\n(b) to tax costs under Chapter 20 Part 12 Division 2 may be exercised by a Registrar\nin a proceeding or class of proceedings if the Chief Justice so directs;\n(c) to make orders under the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 may be exercised\nby a Registrar; or\n(d) to make orders or judgments by consent may be exercised by a Registrar.\nNotes—\nSection 72(1)(i) of the Supreme Court Act 1935 provides that rules of court may be made for\nconferring on the registrar or other member of t\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- on-judicial staff of the court the power to\nadjudicate costs.\nClause 41(1) of Schedule 3 to the Legal Practitioners Act 1981 provides that the power of the\nCourt to adjudicate and settle a bill for costs may be exercised by the Registrar.\nSection 18(1) of the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 provides that a court may, by its rules,\ndelegate any of its powers under that Act to officers of a class designated in the delegation.\n(5) A Registrar may refer a matter in respect of which they have jurisdiction to an\nAssociate Justice.\n(6) An Associate Jus\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- assigned by the Chief Judge or the rules.\n(2) The jurisdiction of the District Court—\n(a) to tax costs under Chapter 16 Part 5 may be exercised by a Registrar in a\nproceeding or class of proceedings if the Chief Judge so directs;\n(b) to make orders under the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 may be exercised\nby a Registrar; or\n(c) to make orders or judgments by consent may be exercised by a Registrar.\nNotes—\nSection 51 of the District Court Act 1991 authorises the making of rules regulating the business\nof the Court and the duties of the various\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- nts by consent may be exercised by a Registrar.\nNotes—\nSection 51 of the District Court Act 1991 authorises the making of rules regulating the business\nof the Court and the duties of the various officers of the Court and regulating costs.\nSection 18(1) of the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 provides that a court may, by its rules,\ndelegate any of its powers under that Act to officers of a class designated in the delegation.\n(3) A Registrar may refer a matter in respect of which they have jurisdiction to an\nAssociate Judge.\n(4) An Associate Judge\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- e or Judicial Registrar\navailable.\n(2) The jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court—\n(a) to tax costs under Chapter 16 Part 5 may be exercised by a Registrar in a\nproceeding or class of proceedings if the Chief Magistrate so directs;\n(b) to make orders under the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 may be exercised\nby a Registrar; or\n(c) to make orders or judgments by consent may be exercised by a Registrar.\nNotes—\nSection 49 of the Magistrates Court Act 1991 authorises the making of rules regulating the\nbusiness of the Court and the duties of the vario\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 4\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Disputed+Returns+%28Reinstated%29+Rules+2024\n\n**Sources**:\n- `pages/media-releases-index__10.html`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- have been prepared by Court staff but DO NOT constitute an official publication thereof. For an official version, reference should be made to the Rules, Supplementary Rules and subsequent amendments as gazetted.\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.docx\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.pdf\nFirst Nations Voice Court\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__10.html`\n- eof. For an official version, reference should be made to the Rules, Supplementary Rules and subsequent amendments as gazetted.\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.docx\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.pdf\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns Forms\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Retur\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__10.html`\n- upplementary Rules and subsequent amendments as gazetted.\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.docx\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.pdf\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns Forms\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns Forms 2024\nForm 1.docx\nForm 1.pdf\nForm 2.docx\nForm 2.pdf\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__10.html`\n- ce Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.docx\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns (Reinstated) Rules 2024.pdf\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns Forms\nTitle\nDownload\nFirst Nations Voice Court of Disputed Returns Forms 2024\nForm 1.docx\nForm 1.pdf\nForm 2.docx\nForm 2.pdf\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__10.html`\n\n### Environment, Resources and Development Act 1993\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 4\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Environment%2C+Resources+and+Development+Act+1993\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- expert for investigation and report and the powers of the\nCourt that may be exercised by the expert.\nNotes—\nSection 67 of the Supreme Court Act 1935, section 34 of the District Court Act 1991, section 29\nof the Magistrates Court Act 1991 and section 27 of the Environment, Resources and\nDevelopment Act 1993 provide that the Court may refer any question arising in a proceeding for\ninvestigation and report by a referee who is an expert in the relevant field.\nPart 2—Judicial powers\n12.1—General powers\n(1) The Court may on its own initiative, or on application by an\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- (1) of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that the Judge is responsible for the\nadministration of the Court. Section 10(8) of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides for the\nGovernor to appoint a District Court Judge as Acting Judge of the Court.\nSection 8(3) of the Environment, Resources and Development Act 1993 provides that the Senior\nJudge is responsible for the administration of the Court. Section 8(7)) of the Environment,\nResources and Development Court Act 1993 provides for the Governor to appoint a District\nCourt Judge as Acting Judge of the Court.\n13.2—Regist\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ion 12(1) of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that the Registrar is the Court’s principal\nadministrative officer. Section 13 of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that the administrative\nstaff are responsible to the Judge of the Court.\nSection 14(1)(a) of the Environment, Resources and Development Act 1993 provides that the\nRegistrar is the Court’s chief administrative officer. Section 14(4) of the Environment,\nResources and Development Act 1993 provides that the administrative staff are responsible to\nthe Senior Judge for the proper and efficient discharge of\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- rt Act 1993 provides that the administrative\nstaff are responsible to the Judge of the Court.\nSection 14(1)(a) of the Environment, Resources and Development Act 1993 provides that the\nRegistrar is the Court’s chief administrative officer. Section 14(4) of the Environment,\nResources and Development Act 1993 provides that the administrative staff are responsible to\nthe Senior Judge for the proper and efficient discharge of their duties.\n(2) If a statute assigns an administrative function to the Court, the function is to be carried\nout by the Registrar.\n(3) The Re\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Legal Practitioners Act 1981\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 4\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Legal+Practitioners+Act+1981\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- the Court or\na Registrar exercising judicial power of the Court conferred by rule 11.5;\n(f) in respect of the Court of Disputed Returns—a Judge or Auxiliary Judge;\njustice included an auxiliary justice;\nlaw firm means a law practice within the meaning of the Legal Practitioners Act 1981\nand includes—\n(a) the Crown Solicitor, Australian Government Solicitor, Office of the Director of\nPublic Prosecutions or any other government body practicing as solicitors;\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rul\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- viding legal aid services practising\nas solicitors; and\n(c) an in-house government, corporate or other solicitor;\nNote—\nIt is the responsibility of a solicitor practising as a law firm to ensure that the solicitor is lawfully\nentitled to so practice under the Legal Practitioners Act 1981. For example, section 51 of that\nAct identifies which legal practitioners are entitled to practise before a State court or tribunal on\nbehalf, amongst others, of the State Government, State Government bodies, the Legal Services\nCommission, community legal cen\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- State Government bodies, the Legal Services\nCommission, community legal centres or the Law Society.\nlawyer means a law firm, solicitor working in a law firm or barrister;\nLaw Society means the Law Society of South Australia;\nLegal Practitioners Act means the Legal Practitioners Act 1981;\nliquidated claim—see rule 142.1;\nlist of documents—see rule 73.1;\nlitigation guardian—see rule 23.6;\nLPEAC means the Legal Practitioners Education and Admission Council;\nMagistrate includes an auxiliary magistrate;\nminor civil action means a minor civil acti\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- a Registrar.\nNotes—\nSection 72(1)(i) of the Supreme Court Act 1935 provides that rules of court may be made for\nconferring on the registrar or other member of the non-judicial staff of the court the power to\nadjudicate costs.\nClause 41(1) of Schedule 3 to the Legal Practitioners Act 1981 provides that the power of the\nCourt to adjudicate and settle a bill for costs may be exercised by the Registrar.\nSection 18(1) of the Enforcement of Judgments Act 1991 provides that a court may, by its rules,\ndelegate any of its powers under that Act to offi\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Uniform Special Statutory Rules 2022\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 4\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Uniform+Special+Statutory+Rules+2022\n\n**Sources**:\n- `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- Uniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - CAA\n\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022\nRichard White\n2022-09-26T14:24:19+09:30\nThese compilations provide access to all Rules, Supplementary Rules and Forms. The compilations have been prepared by Court staff but DO NOT constitute an official publication\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n- cial Statutory Rules 2022 – Schedule 1 – Modifications to Forms\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - Schedule 1 - Modifications to Forms.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - Schedule 1 - Modifications to Forms.pdf\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022.pdf\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 – History of Amendment\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.pdf\nForms\n1. All forms are a\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n- Modifications to Forms\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - Schedule 1 - Modifications to Forms.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - Schedule 1 - Modifications to Forms.pdf\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022.pdf\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 – History of Amendment\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.pdf\nForms\n1. All forms are available below in both Word and PDF forma\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n- tutory Rules 2022 - Schedule 1 - Modifications to Forms.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - Schedule 1 - Modifications to Forms.pdf\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022.pdf\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 – History of Amendment\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.docx\nUniform Special Statutory Rules 2022 - History of Amendment.pdf\nForms\n1. All forms are available below in both Word and PDF format.\nHowever, the following forms do not nee\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n\n### Court. Uniform Civil Rules 2020\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 3\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Court.+Uniform+Civil+Rules+2020\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- entative proceeding under this Part vests in the representative party and not in the\nrepresented parties.\n24.11—Costs of representative party\n(1) The Court may order that the costs of a representative party be paid out of a fund or by\npersons nominated by the Court.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 87]\n45\n(2) Without limiting the effect of subrule (1), if judgment is granted in favour of a\nrepresentative party or a proceeding or appellate proceeding has been or is to be\nresolved\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- le (2) applied; or\n(b) in any other case—must produce to the Registry additional copies to be sealed\nfor the purpose of service.\n(4) A party, upon payment of the prescribed fee, may request the Registrar to provide a\ncertified copy of a document issued by the Court.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 103]\n61\nChapter 5—Service\nPart 1—Service obligations\n41.1—Service of filed documents on other parties\nA party or other person who files a document must as soon as practicable serve it\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- itled—the Court may instead, in\nthe exercise of its discretion, amend the judgment to the correct amount;\n(c) if the only irregularity was that judgment was entered for a fixed amount when\nit should have been entered for an amount or relief to be assessed—the Court\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2025\n\n[page 205]\n163\nmay instead, in the exercise of its discretion, amend the judgment to a judgment\nfor an amount or relief to be assessed.\n142.12—Application to set aside on other grounds\n(1)\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### District Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 3\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=District+Court+Civil+Supplementary+Rules+2014\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- Rules 2006\naddressed the requirement to serve a notice before action making an offer to settle and providing\ndetails of the claim in all cases in the Supreme and District Courts except those governed by the\nSupreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the District Court Civil Supplementary\nRules 2014 respectively.\nRules 8 to 34 of the Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and of the District Court\nCivil Supplementary Rules 2014 addressed the requirement to serve a notice before action\nmaking an offer to settle and providing details of the claim in\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- cases in the Supreme and District Courts except those governed by the\nSupreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the District Court Civil Supplementary\nRules 2014 respectively.\nRules 8 to 34 of the Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and of the District Court\nCivil Supplementary Rules 2014 addressed the requirement to serve a notice before action\nmaking an offer to settle and providing details of the claim in all construction disputes and\nmedical negligence disputes (as defined therein) in the Supreme and District Courts.\nRule 21A of the Magist\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- reme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the Supreme Court Fast\nTrack Rules Adoption Rules 2014 and the Supreme Court Fast Track\nSupplementary Rules Adoption Rules 2014;\n(b) in the context of the District Court—the District Court Civil Rules 2006 and the\nDistrict Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the District Court Fast Track\nRules Adoption Rules 2014 and the Local Government Court of Disputed\nReturns Rules 2000 and the District Court Fast Track Supplementary Rules\nAdoption Rules 2014;\n(c) in the context of the Magistrates Court—the Magistrates Co\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Gene Technology Act 2000\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 3\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Gene+Technology+Act+2000\n\n**Sources**:\n- `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- nt - Fisheries Management Act (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BB Search Warrant – Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth)\nForm 102BB Search Warrant - Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth).docx\nForm 102BB Search Warrant - Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BC Search Warrant – Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth)\nForm 102BC Search Warrant - Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BC Search Warrant - Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth).docx\nForm 102BD Search Warrant – Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth)\nForm 102BD Search Warrant - Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n- arrant – Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth)\nForm 102BB Search Warrant - Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth).docx\nForm 102BB Search Warrant - Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BC Search Warrant – Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth)\nForm 102BC Search Warrant - Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BC Search Warrant - Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth).docx\nForm 102BD Search Warrant – Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth)\nForm 102BD Search Warrant - Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth).docx\nForm 102BD Search Warrant - Human Services (Medicare\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n- rant - Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth).docx\nForm 102BB Search Warrant - Fuel Quality Standards Act (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BC Search Warrant – Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth)\nForm 102BC Search Warrant - Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BC Search Warrant - Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth).docx\nForm 102BD Search Warrant – Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth)\nForm 102BD Search Warrant - Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth).docx\nForm 102BD Search Warrant - Human Services (Medicare) Act (Cth).pdf\nForm 102BF Search Warrant – Migration Act (Cth)\n Source: `pages/media-releases-index__08.html`\n\n### Motor Vehicles Act 1959\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 3\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Motor+Vehicles+Act+1959\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- niform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 82]\n40\n(6) A person who is 17 years old may bring an originating application to appeal against a\nprovisional licence disqualification under section 81BB of the Motor Vehicles Act\n1959.\nNote—\nSee rule 244.9.\n(7) A person who seeks to be approved by the Court as a litigation guardian pursuant to\nrule 23.7(1)(d) may either—\n(a) institute a proceeding seeking such approval by originating application\nsupported by an affidavit; or\n(b) institute\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- respect of a person who commences a personal injury claim in the\nCourt for damages for personal injury suffered by that person, except a person who\nhas, before the expiration of the period referred to in subrule (2)—\n(a) given notice under section 126A of the Motor Vehicles Act 1959; or\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 122]\n80\n(b) made a claim under section 30 of the Return to Work Act 2014.\nNotes—\nA person for whom insurance is provided under Part 4 of the Motor Vehicle\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- cles Act 1959; or\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 122]\n80\n(b) made a claim under section 30 of the Return to Work Act 2014.\nNotes—\nA person for whom insurance is provided under Part 4 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 is required\nby section 126A of that Act to provide notice of the injury in the circumstances and manner\nspecified by that section.\nA person who makes a claim under section 30 of the Return to Work Act 2014 is required to\nprovide notice of the injury in the ci\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 3\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Supreme+Court+Civil+Supplementary+Rules+2014\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- urt Civil Rules 2006 and of the District Court Civil Rules 2006\naddressed the requirement to serve a notice before action making an offer to settle and providing\ndetails of the claim in all cases in the Supreme and District Courts except those governed by the\nSupreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the District Court Civil Supplementary\nRules 2014 respectively.\nRules 8 to 34 of the Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and of the District Court\nCivil Supplementary Rules 2014 addressed the requirement to serve a notice before action\nmaking an\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- fer to settle and providing\ndetails of the claim in all cases in the Supreme and District Courts except those governed by the\nSupreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the District Court Civil Supplementary\nRules 2014 respectively.\nRules 8 to 34 of the Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and of the District Court\nCivil Supplementary Rules 2014 addressed the requirement to serve a notice before action\nmaking an offer to settle and providing details of the claim in all construction disputes and\nmedical negligence disputes (as defined therein) i\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ion or to control their disposition, whether or not the power\nis one that would be recognised at law or equity;\nprescribed forms—see rule 31.3(1) and (4);\nPrevious Rules means—\n(a) in the context of the Supreme Court—the Supreme Court Civil Rules 2006 and\nthe Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 and the Supreme Court Fast\nTrack Rules Adoption Rules 2014 and the Supreme Court Fast Track\nSupplementary Rules Adoption Rules 2014;\n(b) in the context of the District Court—the District Court Civil Rules 2006 and the\nDistrict Court Civil Supplementary Rules\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: high\n**Mentions**: 3\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Trans-Tasman+Proceedings+Act+2010\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- tion of Process Act 1992 (Cth).\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 133]\n91\nClaim documents served in New Zealand must contain or be accompanied by the information\ncontained in section 11 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth).\n63.5—First directions hearing\n(1) In the normal course, the Court will list the first directions hearing in a proceeding\nseveral weeks after a defence is filed to allow time for pleadings and discovery to be\ncompleted.\n(2) If a party seeks an urgent in\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- her State is effective only if there is\ncompliance with section 16 of the Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth).\nOriginating Application documents served in New Zealand must contain or be accompanied by\nthe information contained in section 11 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth).\n82.5—Absence of service\n(1) If the Originating Documents have not been served on all other parties within 6 months,\nor such other period as the Court thinks fit, the Court may dismiss the action.\n(2) If the Court dismisses an action under subrule (1),\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- ulterior purpose;\n(d) the order is authorised by statute; or\n(e) the order is necessary in the interests of justice.\nNote—\nSection 1335 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), section 19 of the Service and Execution of\nProcess Act 1992 (Cth) and section 15 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth)\nempower the Court to order security for costs in defined circumstances.\nUniform Civil Rules 2020\nCurrent to 15 March 2026 - Uniform Civil (No 16) Amending Rules 2026\n\n[page 185]\n143\n(2) The Court may order a stay of the action until security is given.\n(\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: medium\n**Mentions**: 1\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Courts+%28Cross-Vesting%29+Act+1987\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- who is not an existing party and encompasses\na counter claim, third party claim and contribution claim;\nCross Claim means a Cross Claim as described in rule 65.3;\nCross claim documents—see rule 65.5;\ncross-vesting legislation means the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987\nand counterpart legislation of the other States and the Commonwealth;\ndirections hearing means any hearing in a proceeding other than a trial or hearing at\nwhich the proceeding is or may be finally determined;\ndocument— see definition in section 4 of the Legi\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Crown Proceedings Act 1992\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: low\n**Mentions**: 2\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Crown+Proceedings+Act+1992\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- .\n8 Other body corporate Document is served in accordance with\nserved elsewhere in section 10(2) or (3) of the Service and\nAustralia Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth).\n9 The State of South Document is served in accordance with\nAustralia section 13(3) of the Crown Proceedings\nAct 1992.\n10 The Commonwealth of Document is served in accordance with\nAustralia or a State section 63 of the Judiciary Act 1901.\n11 Council Document is served in accordance with\nsection 280 of the Local Government\nAct 1999.\n12 Partnership Document is:\n(a) served pers\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n- lief, how it is known that the address at which the document was\nserved is the requisite office or place of business of the entity to be served.\n(5) If service is effected on a solicitor acting for the State of South Australia pursuant to\nsection 13(3) of the Crown Proceedings Act 1992, the affidavit of proof of service\nmust—\n(a) be by the person who served the document on the solicitor—\n(i) state how the solicitor was identified; and\n(ii) set out the conversation with the solicitor about the document, the person\nto be served and the identi\n Source: `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Cth). Uniform Civil Rules 2020\n\n**Type**: Rules\n**Confidence**: low\n**Mentions**: 2\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/search?query=Cth%29.+Uniform+Civil+Rules+2020\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- ent is served in accordance with\nSouth Australia or New section 601CX\n\n_…truncated, open the .md file for the full content._",
"global_initiatives_md": null,
"strategy": {
"reporting_period": "2024-25",
"corporate_plan_period": "2025-26",
"vision": null,
"vision_source_page": null,
"purposes": null,
"purposes_source_page": null,
"how_we_deliver": null,
"how_we_deliver_source_page": null,
"government_priorities": [],
"outcomes": [],
"values": [],
"values_framework_name": null,
"kpi_targets_2025_26": [],
"kpi_results_2024_25": [],
"_source_urls": {
"annual_report_url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/download/judges-annual-reports/?ind=1764112394227&filename=2025_Judges_Annual_Report_SC.pdf&wpdmdl=8308&refresh=6a04524c9e6f91778668108",
"corporate_plan_url": ""
}
},
"ideas": [
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Data & Performance",
"scale": "small",
"title": "KPI evidence register with named owners",
"idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.",
"quote": "[pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 92AP\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORDER – TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nIntroduction\nHearing\nHearing Location: [location]\n[Hearing date]\n[name of judicial officer]\nAppearances\n[Applicant Appearance Information]\nRemarks\nThe Magistrate is satisfied that:\n(a) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that data held on a computer or data storage device, namely [describe\ndevice specifically or generically] (‘the Device’), may afford evidence of a child exploitation offence;\n(b) [Full Name of Specified Person], date of birth [date], (‘the Specified Person’) is:\n reasonably suspected of having committed a child exploitation offence in relation to which the order is sought.",
"impact": "High",
"effort": "Low",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
"source": "strategies/Form-92AP-Order---To-Provide-Information-or-Assistance-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat07-Final-order/Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf)",
"implementation": [
"Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
"Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
"Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
"Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Data & Performance",
"scale": "large",
"title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact",
"idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.",
"quote": "[pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 92AP\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORDER – TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nIntroduction\nHearing\nHearing Location: [location]\n[Hearing date]\n[name of judicial officer]\nAppearances\n[Applicant Appearance Information]\nRemarks\nThe Magistrate is satisfied that:\n(a) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that data held on a computer or data storage device, namely [describe\ndevice specifically or generically] (‘the Device’), may afford evidence of a child exploitation offence;\n(b) [Full Name of Specified Person], date of birth [date], (‘the Specified Person’) is:\n reasonably suspected of having committed a child exploitation offence in relation to which the order is sought.",
"impact": "Very High",
"effort": "High",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
"source": "strategies/Form-92AP-Order---To-Provide-Information-or-Assistance-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat07-Final-order/Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf)",
"implementation": [
"Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
"Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
"Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
"Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Citizen Services",
"scale": "small",
"title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates",
"idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.",
"quote": "Contact us\ncaa_admin\n2023-12-05T14:02:01+10:30\nQuestions regarding CourtSA\nCourtSA Registry Services\nIf you have any queries regarding CourtSA please contact our CourtSA Registry Services, their contact details can be found on this page, including phone, email address and live chat.",
"impact": "High",
"effort": "Low",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
"source": "pages/contact.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/contact-us/)",
"implementation": [
"Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
"Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
"Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
"Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Digital exclusion",
"Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Citizen Services",
"scale": "large",
"title": "Single front door for life-event based services",
"idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.",
"quote": "Contact us\ncaa_admin\n2023-12-05T14:02:01+10:30\nQuestions regarding CourtSA\nCourtSA Registry Services\nIf you have any queries regarding CourtSA please contact our CourtSA Registry Services, their contact details can be found on this page, including phone, email address and live chat.",
"impact": "Very High",
"effort": "High",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
"source": "pages/contact.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/contact-us/)",
"implementation": [
"Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
"Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
"Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
"Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Digital exclusion",
"Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Risk & Assurance",
"scale": "small",
"title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
"idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
"quote": "It does no more than allow lawyers and others to inform the court of the correct pronunciation of their name and their preferred gender [...]\nSharon Moloney\n2023-11-07T07:48:47+10:30\nNovember 6th, 2023\n|\nCourts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns\n1 November 2023 Courts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns The Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia, has today issued a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns.",
"impact": "High",
"effort": "Low",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
"source": "pages/media-releases-index__01.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/page/2/)",
"implementation": [
"Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
"Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
"Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
"Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Regulatory capture",
"Over-automation of judgement"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Risk & Assurance",
"scale": "large",
"title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
"idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
"quote": "It does no more than allow lawyers and others to inform the court of the correct pronunciation of their name and their preferred gender [...]\nSharon Moloney\n2023-11-07T07:48:47+10:30\nNovember 6th, 2023\n|\nCourts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns\n1 November 2023 Courts issue a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns The Honourable Chris Kourakis, Chief Justice of South Australia, has today issued a Practice Note about pronunciation of names and gender pronouns.",
"impact": "Very High",
"effort": "High",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
"source": "pages/media-releases-index__01.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/page/2/)",
"implementation": [
"Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
"Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
"Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
"Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Regulatory capture",
"Over-automation of judgement"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Case Processing",
"scale": "small",
"title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases",
"idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.",
"quote": "[pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 4G\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORIGINATING APPLICATION EX PARTE – APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO\nPROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nApplicant\nFull Name\nName of responsible\nofficer If applicable Full Name\nResponsible officer details\nIf applicable\nRank/position Number/identifier\nName of law firm/solicitor\nIf any\nLaw Firm Responsible Solicitor\nAddress for service\nStreet Address (including unit or level number and name of property if required)\nCity/town/suburb State Postcode Country\nEmail address\nPhone Details\nType (eg. home; work; mobile) – Number Another number (optional)\nApplication Details\nThis Application is made under section 74BR of the Summary Offences Act 1953 in connection with a child",
"impact": "High",
"effort": "Low",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
"source": "strategies/Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf)",
"implementation": [
"Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
"Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
"Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
"Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Case Processing",
"scale": "large",
"title": "End-to-end case processing redesign",
"idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.",
"quote": "[pages 1,2]\n[Page 1]\nForm 4G\nCase Number:\nDate Filed:\nFDN:\nORIGINATING APPLICATION EX PARTE – APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO\nPROVIDE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE TO ACCESS DATA\nSummary Offences Act 1953 s 74BR\nA DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA\nSPECIAL STATUTORY JURISDICTION\n[FULL NAME]\nApplicant\nApplicant\nFull Name\nName of responsible\nofficer If applicable Full Name\nResponsible officer details\nIf applicable\nRank/position Number/identifier\nName of law firm/solicitor\nIf any\nLaw Firm Responsible Solicitor\nAddress for service\nStreet Address (including unit or level number and name of property if required)\nCity/town/suburb State Postcode Country\nEmail address\nPhone Details\nType (eg. home; work; mobile) – Number Another number (optional)\nApplication Details\nThis Application is made under section 74BR of the Summary Offences Act 1953 in connection with a child",
"impact": "Very High",
"effort": "High",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
"source": "strategies/Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf)",
"implementation": [
"Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
"Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
"Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
"Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Staff Productivity",
"scale": "small",
"title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents",
"idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.",
"quote": "Section 13 of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that the administrative\nstaff are responsible to the Judge of the Court.",
"impact": "High",
"effort": "Low",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
"source": "other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf)",
"implementation": [
"Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
"Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
"Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
"Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Sensitive information leakage",
"Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Staff Productivity",
"scale": "large",
"title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform",
"idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.",
"quote": "Section 13 of the Youth Court Act 1993 provides that the administrative\nstaff are responsible to the Judge of the Court.",
"impact": "Very High",
"effort": "High",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
"source": "other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf)",
"implementation": [
"Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
"Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
"Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
"Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Sensitive information leakage",
"Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Citizen Participation",
"scale": "small",
"title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking",
"idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.",
"quote": "It is an appropriate time to retire.
\nI express my deep gratitude to those judicial officers of this State who, through their diligent and conscientious commitment to the administration of justice, have lightened my burden.
\nI also thank the Executive leadership and all other staff of the Courts Administration Authority for their dedicated and exemplary support of the judiciary and their service to our community.
\nThe post Statement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis Chief Justice of South Australia appeared first on CAA.
\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nhttps://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/03/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator-2/\nSharon Moloney",
"impact": "High",
"effort": "Low",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
"source": "pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)",
"implementation": [
"Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
"Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
"Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
"Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Digital exclusion",
"Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
]
},
{
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"category": "Citizen Participation",
"scale": "large",
"title": "Always-on policy participation platform",
"idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.",
"quote": "It is an appropriate time to retire.\nI express my deep gratitude to those judicial officers of this State who, through their diligent and conscientious commitment to the administration of justice, have lightened my burden.
\nI also thank the Executive leadership and all other staff of the Courts Administration Authority for their dedicated and exemplary support of the judiciary and their service to our community.
\nThe post Statement from the Honourable Chris Kourakis Chief Justice of South Australia appeared first on CAA.
\nA statement from the State Courts Administrator\nhttps://www.courts.sa.gov.au/2025/12/03/a-statement-from-the-state-courts-administrator-2/\nSharon Moloney",
"impact": "Very High",
"effort": "High",
"proof": "Evidence-backed",
"beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
"source": "pages/media-releases-index__02.html (https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/category/media-releases/feed/)",
"implementation": [
"Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
"Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
"Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
"Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
],
"risks": [
"Privacy and data quality",
"Change fatigue",
"Unclear accountability",
"Digital exclusion",
"Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
]
}
],
"legislation_administered": [],
"artifacts": [
{
"category": "strategies",
"year": null,
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf",
"file": "strategies/Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.pdf",
"bytes": 113987,
"link_text": "Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf"
},
{
"category": "strategies",
"year": null,
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat07-Final-order/Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf",
"file": "strategies/Form-92AP-Order---To-Provide-Information-or-Assistance-to-Access-Data.pdf",
"bytes": 131699,
"link_text": "Form 92AP Order - To Provide Information or Assistance to Access Data.pdf"
},
{
"category": "other-pdfs",
"year": "2020",
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.pdf",
"file": "other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020---History-of-Amendment.pdf",
"bytes": 575614,
"link_text": "Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - History of Amendment.pdf"
},
{
"category": "other-pdfs",
"year": "2020",
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf",
"file": "other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf",
"bytes": 4662348,
"link_text": "Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf"
},
{
"category": "other-pdfs",
"year": "2020",
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf",
"file": "other-pdfs/Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020---Schedule-7---Modifications-to-Prescribed-Forms.pdf",
"bytes": 70486,
"link_text": "Uniform Civil Rules 2020 - Schedule 7 - Modifications to Prescribed Forms.pdf"
},
{
"category": "other-pdfs",
"year": "2020",
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-rules/08-uniform-civil-rules/Modifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf",
"file": "other-pdfs/Modifications-to-Uniform-Civil-Rules-2020.pdf",
"bytes": 11050,
"link_text": "Modifications to Uniform Civil Rules 2020.pdf"
},
{
"category": "other-pdfs",
"year": null,
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/uniform-civil-rules/01-pre-action/Form P1 Final Notice.pdf",
"file": "other-pdfs/Form-P1-Final-Notice.pdf",
"bytes": 168510,
"link_text": "Form P1 Final Notice.pdf"
},
{
"category": "annual-reports",
"year": "2025",
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/download/judges-annual-reports/?ind=1764112394227&filename=2025_Judges_Annual_Report_SC.pdf&wpdmdl=8308&refresh=6a04524c9e6f91778668108",
"file": "annual-reports/2025.pdf",
"bytes": 547062,
"link_text": "Annual Report"
}
],
"_meta": {
"snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-13T11:02:45+00:00",
"strategy_brief_meta": {
"model": "nova-micro",
"folder": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"annual_report": {
"file": null,
"url": "",
"year": null
},
"corporate_plan": {
"file": "strategies\\Form-4G-Originating-Application-Ex-Parte---Order-to-Access-Data.txt",
"url": "https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/wp-download-manager-files/court-forms/special-forms/Cat01-Origination/Form 4G Originating Application Ex Parte - Order to Access Data.pdf",
"year": null
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 1487,
"output_tokens": 155,
"total_tokens": 1642,
"model": "nova-micro"
},
"cost_usd": 7.3745e-05,
"elapsed_seconds": 1.13,
"generated_at": "2026-05-13T10:33:32+00:00"
},
"ideas_manifest": {
"entity_id": "S-SA-015",
"entity_name": "Courts Administration Authority",
"folder_name": "Courts-Administration-Authority",
"generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:06:27.706404+00:00",
"idea_count": 12,
"markdown": "ideas/Courts-Administration-Authority_ideas.md",
"jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
"inputs": [
"Courts-Administration-Authority_strategy-overview.md",
"strategy-evidence.json",
"global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
]
},
"global_intel_meta": null
}
}