{ "entity_id": "B-003221", "folder": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "type": "Inter-jurisdictional Body", "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth", "portfolio": "Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry", "website": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/partnerships", "data_status": "partial", "completeness": { "has_strategy_brief": true, "has_strategy_structured": true, "has_vision": false, "has_kpi_targets": true, "has_kpi_results": true, "has_strategy_overview": true, "has_legislation_text": true, "has_legislation_structured": false, "has_global_initiatives_text": false, "has_ideas": true, "has_artifacts": true, "n_ideas": 12, "n_legislation": 0, "n_artifacts": 5, "n_kpi_targets": 5, "n_kpi_results": 5, "n_outcomes": 1, "verified_own_data": true }, "strategy_profile": { "status": "needs_review", "confidence": "medium", "summary": "To maintain Australia’s healthy and resilient marine environment that is protected from the threat of marine pests, and which supports our economy and social amenity.", "official_site_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/partnerships", "source_documents": [ { "type": "strategie", "title": "National marine pest stakeholder engagement strategy (PDF 442 KB)", "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "period": null, "confidence": "medium" } ], "purpose": null, "vision": null, "strategic_priorities": [], "values": [ { "name": "Collaboration", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Transparency", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Preparedness", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Research and Development", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "source_page": null } ], "outcomes": [ { "name": "Outcome 1: Marine Pest Biosecurity", "description": "To maintain Australia’s healthy and resilient marine environment that is protected from the threat of marine pests, and which supports our economy and social amenity.", "activities": [ "Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread", "Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system", "Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions", "Support marine pest biosecurity research and development", "Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests" ], "source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "source_page": 3, "source_deep_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=3" } ], "performance_measures": [ { "code": "MPE01", "measure": "Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions", "target": "Stability or improvement", "latest_result": "Partially achieved", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "target_source_page": 5, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE02", "measure": "Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system", "target": "Stability or improvement", "latest_result": "Mostly achieved", "status": "Mostly achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "target_source_page": 5, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE03", "measure": "Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability", "target": "Stability or improvement", "latest_result": "Partially achieved", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "target_source_page": 5, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE04", "measure": "Support marine pest biosecurity research and development", "target": "Stability or improvement", "latest_result": "Stably achieved", "status": "Stably achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "target_source_page": 5, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE05", "measure": "Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests", "target": "Stability or improvement", "latest_result": "Partially achieved", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "target_source_page": 5, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 12 } ], "document_alignment_terms": { "must_support": [], "watch_terms": [ "Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions", "Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system", "Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability", "Support marine pest biosecurity research and development", "Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests" ], "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": [] }, "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete." }, "strategy_brief_md": "# Marine Pest Sectoral Committee — Strategy Brief\n\n**Reporting period**: 2024-25\n**Corporate plan in force**: 2025-26\n**Corporate Plan**: [2025-26](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)\n\n## Outcomes\n\n### Outcome 1: Marine Pest Biosecurity\nTo maintain Australia’s healthy and resilient marine environment that is protected from the threat of marine pests, and which supports our economy and social amenity. [[CP p.3](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=3)]\n\n**Key activities:**\n- Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread\n- Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system\n- Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions\n- Support marine pest biosecurity research and development\n- Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests\n\n## Values and principles\n\n_National Marine Pest Biosecurity Strategy_\n\n- Collaboration\n- Transparency\n- Preparedness\n- Research and Development\n\n## What they will measure themselves on this year (targets from 2025-26 corporate plan)\n\n| Code | Measure | Target | Source |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| MPE01 | Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions | Stability or improvement | [CP p.5](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=5) |\n| MPE02 | Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system | Stability or improvement | [CP p.5](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=5) |\n| MPE03 | Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability | Stability or improvement | [CP p.5](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=5) |\n| MPE04 | Support marine pest biosecurity research and development | Stability or improvement | [CP p.5](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=5) |\n| MPE05 | Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests | Stability or improvement | [CP p.5](https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf#page=5) |\n\n## How they performed last year (results from 2024-25 annual report)\n\n| Code | Measure | Result | Status | Source |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| MPE01 | Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions | Partially achieved | Partially achieved | AR p.12 |\n| MPE02 | Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system | Mostly achieved | Mostly achieved | AR p.12 |\n| MPE03 | Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability | Partially achieved | Partially achieved | AR p.12 |\n| MPE04 | Support marine pest biosecurity research and development | Stably achieved | Stably achieved | AR p.12 |\n| MPE05 | Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests | Partially achieved | Partially achieved | AR p.12 |", "strategy_overview_evidence_md": null, "internal_strategy_evidence_md": "# Marine Pest Sectoral Committee - Strategy, Performance, and Operating Profile\n\n**Generated at**: 2026-05-09T22:08:26.711264+00:00\n**Entity ID**: B-003221\n**Entity type**: Inter-jurisdictional Body\n**Jurisdiction**: Commonwealth\n**Portfolio**: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry\n**Website**: https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/partnerships\n\n> Draft generated from scraped source material. Treat this as an evidence pack for editorial review, not a final judgement.\n\n## Source Coverage\n\n| Source type | Count |\n|---|---:|\n| other-pdfs | 4 |\n| pages | 9 |\n| strategies | 1 |\n\n## Executive Readout\n\n### Purpose\n\n- [Page 10]\nTable of Contents\ni FOrEwOrd\n14 OB j e C T i v e S A N D\nA C T i v iT i e S\niii ExEcutivE SuMMAry\n16 Objective 1: Minimise the risk\nv SuMMAry OF\nof marine pest introductions,\nObjEctivES & ActivitiES\nestablishment and spread\n20 Objective 2: Strengthen the\nnational marine pest surveillance\n1 i N T r O D u C T i O N\nsystem\n2 Why we need a plan 26 Objective 3: Enhance Australia’s\npreparedness and response\ncapability for marine pest\nintroductions\n4 N AT i O N A L v iS i O N\n30 Objective 4: Support marine\npest biosecurity research and\n4 A coordinated approach development\n5 Guiding principles 35 Objective 5: Engage stakeholders\nto better manage marine pest\n6 Scope biosecurity\n7 Implementation\n8 Roles and responsibilities\n4 0 GL O S S Ar y A N D\nA C r O N y M S\n10 4 2\nC u r r e N T T h r e AT S , r eF e r eN C e S\nF u T u r e C hA L L e N Ge S\n12 Outcomes for 2022\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2,3]\n[Page 1]\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review 2020\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review\nIntroduction\nThe purpose of this mid-term review (the review) is to document progress on strategic\nobjectives and associated activities in MarinePestPlan 2018–2023.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)`\n- The review addressed these objectives throughout five key phases of the MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nlifecycle:\n1) Development – including the development process, stakeholder engagement and national\nendorsement\n2) Implementation – including roles and responsibilities, monitoring and prioritisation,\nresourcing and communication\n3) Outcomes and achievements – including the effectiveness of projects within\nMarinePestPlan’s five objectives and significant outcomes and achievements of the Plan\n4) Future approaches for marine pest biosecurity – including the need for a successor plan, and\npriority areas or activities to be included in a successor plan\n5) Considerations for a successor plan – including cooperation, communication, the biosecurity\nthreat landscape, and resourcing.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- 6.1 Development of a successor plan\nKey findings – development of a successor plan\n• 100% of survey respondents agreed that a successor plan to MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nshould be developed.\n• The successor plan should clearly outline its priorities and desired outcomes to maintain\nengagement with stakeholders, especially non-government stakeholders.\n• All five objectives in the current MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 are relevant for inclusion in a\nsuccessor plan; however, additional priority areas for inclusion could also be considered.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n\n### Role and Functions\n\n- [Page 9]\nSummary of\nObjectives and Activities\nObjective 3: Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions\n3.1 Plan and implement a national program of marine pest emergency response exercises\n3.2 Develop a benefit–cost analysis framework to guide response efforts in the event of a\nnationally significant marine pest incursion\nActivities 3.3 Identify marine pest emergency response training needs\n3.4 Review the national Emergency Marine Pest Plan (EMPPlan) framework\n3.5 Plan and implement procedures to develop and update the EMPPlan rapid response\nmanuals and related guidance materials\nObjective 4: Support marine pest biosecurity research and development\n4.1 Periodically review the national marine pest biosecurity research and development priorities\n4.2 Promote research coordination through the national marine pest research network\n4.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [pages 9,10,11]\n4.4 Conduct risk analyses of marine pest vectors and pathways, and make recommendations\nfor improved management\n4.5 Assess the effectiveness of current management options for biofouling in niche areas\nObjective 5: Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pest biosecurity\n5.1 Identify and build a profile of marine pest biosecurity stakeholders\n5.2 Develop a national stakeholder engagement strategy for MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 and\nthe Marine Pest Sectoral Committee\n5.3 Design a targeted national campaign to improve awareness of marine pest biosecurity\nActivities\nrisks, management actions and shared responsibilities\n5.4 Review, update and maintain the www.marinepests.gov.au website\n5.5 Establish an independent national marine pest network\nSource: James Lavender\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 vi\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [Page 10]\nTable of Contents\ni FOrEwOrd\n14 OB j e C T i v e S A N D\nA C T i v iT i e S\niii ExEcutivE SuMMAry\n16 Objective 1: Minimise the risk\nv SuMMAry OF\nof marine pest introductions,\nObjEctivES & ActivitiES\nestablishment and spread\n20 Objective 2: Strengthen the\nnational marine pest surveillance\n1 i N T r O D u C T i O N\nsystem\n2 Why we need a plan 26 Objective 3: Enhance Australia’s\npreparedness and response\ncapability for marine pest\nintroductions\n4 N AT i O N A L v iS i O N\n30 Objective 4: Support marine\npest biosecurity research and\n4 A coordinated approach development\n5 Guiding principles 35 Objective 5: Engage stakeholders\nto better manage marine pest\n6 Scope biosecurity\n7 Implementation\n8 Roles and responsibilities\n4 0 GL O S S Ar y A N D\nA C r O N y M S\n10 4 2\nC u r r e N T T h r e AT S , r eF e r eN C e S\nF u T u r e C hA L L e N Ge S\n12 Outcomes for 2022\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [Page 15]\nGuiding\nprinciples\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 has been developed on the basis of several principles that are\nconsistent with Australia’s integrated approach to biosecurity (see the iGAb). these guiding\nprinciples acknowledge that:\n¬ Marine pest biosecurity is a shared ¬ Management of marine pests should apply\nresponsibility between the Australian a risk-based approach with a focus on\nGovernment, state and territory governments, achievable outcomes, and a clear line of sight\nindustry, research organisations, between ‘what we do’ (our activities) and ‘what\nnon-government organisations, and other we want to achieve’ as a result of what we do\nusers of the marine environment.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- The review addressed these objectives throughout five key phases of the MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nlifecycle:\n1) Development – including the development process, stakeholder engagement and national\nendorsement\n2) Implementation – including roles and responsibilities, monitoring and prioritisation,\nresourcing and communication\n3) Outcomes and achievements – including the effectiveness of projects within\nMarinePestPlan’s five objectives and significant outcomes and achievements of the Plan\n4) Future approaches for marine pest biosecurity – including the need for a successor plan, and\npriority areas or activities to be included in a successor plan\n5) Considerations for a successor plan – including cooperation, communication, the biosecurity\nthreat landscape, and resourcing.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- 4.4 Communication\nKey findings – communication of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n• Communication on the implementation of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 and its\nachievements was considered effective by less than a majority of stakeholders.\n• Some communication mechanisms were preferred to foster inclusivity among\nstakeholders and effectively communicate updates (e.g., MPSC biannual meetings, web\npage updates).\n• Improved communication should be a priority of a successor plan, including shared\nstakeholder responsibility for communication and a broader range of communication\nactivities.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n\n### Strategic Priorities\n\n- Figure 17 Overall effectiveness of activity implementation for Objective 2 (% of\nrespondents, n = 24)\nEffective Neutral Ineffective Unsure/prefer not to say\n67% 13% 17% 4%\nSignificant outcomes of Objective 2 include the development and implementation of the National\nMarine Pest Surveillance Strategy, which outlines national priorities and strategic direction for\nmarine pest surveillance over five years (2021-2026).\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [Page 36]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nMarine pest list List details No. of marine\nspecies on list\nQueensland—the Biosecurity Act 2014 (Schedule 1, Part 5) lists prohibited 33\nspecies of marine animals and plants (Queensland Department of Agriculture\nand Fisheries 2017)\nNew South Wales—prohibited matter, including marine pests, is listed in the 40\nBiosecurity Act 2015 (Schedule 2) (Department for Planning and Spaces 2018).\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 37]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCandidate species reference sources\nTable E2 Candidate species list for Algae (Chlorophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAvrainvillea – – X – – – – – Initial screening—low impact\namadelpha (biofouling risk assessment)\n(Leather mudweed)\nCaulerpa filiformis – – – – – – X – Initial screening—moderate\n(Green macroalga) impact (CCIMPE review)\nCaulerpa cylindracea – – X – – – – – Step 1 (1B)—species is native\n(Grape algae)\nCaulerpa taxifolia Trigger list: – X – All Exotic X – Step 1 (1B, 1D)—species is\n(Aquarium weed) exotic native and not readily\nidentifiable in the field\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 38]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E3 Candidate species list: Algae (Miozoa)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAlexandrium Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nmonilatum holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Toxic dinoflagellate) exotic environment\nAlexandrium spp. – – X – WA – X – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(A. catenella, feasibly be controlled in the\nA. minutum, environment\nA. tamarense)\n(Toxic dinoflagellate)\nDinophysis Trigger list: – X – NT, WA – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nnorvegica (Toxic holoplankton feasibly be controlled in the\ndinoflagellate) exotic environment\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 39]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E4 Candidate species list: Algae (Ochrophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nChaetoceros Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nconcavicornis holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Centric diatom) exotic environment\nChaetoceros Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 1E—cannot feasibly be\nconvolutus holoplankton WA controlled in the environment)\n(Centric diatom) exotic\nChattonella antiqua – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(Raphidophyte) feasibly be controlled in the\nenvironment\nCorethron pennatum – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n[syn.\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 44]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nCharybdis japonica Trigger list: – X X NT, Qld, – X – Step 2 (criterion 3)—\n(Asian paddle crab) exotic NSW, SA, insufficient negative impacts\nWA from species\nChthamalus proteus – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(Atlantic barnacle) readily identifiable in the field\nand cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nCirolana harfordi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Speckled pill bug) (CCIMPE review)\nCrangonyx floridanus – – – X – – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Florida crangonyctid (biofouling risk assessment)\namphipod)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 45]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nHemigrapsus takanoi Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – Shane Ahyong Step 1 (1D)—species is not\n(Pacific crab) exotic NSW, SA, readily identifiable in the field\nWA\nHesperibalanus fallax – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\n(Warm water not readily identifiable in the\nbarnacle) field, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\nand pathways and vectors\ncannot feasibly be managed\nLaticorophium baconi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(North American (CCIMPE review)\nPacific corophiid)\nLoxothylacus – – – X – – – – Initial screening—parasitic\npanopaei species\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 46]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nMonocorophium – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nsextonae (CCIMPE review)\n(Corophiid amphipod)\nPachygrapsus – – – X WA – – Northern Australia Step 1 (1D)—species is not\nfakaravensi Priority Pesta readily identifiable in the field\n(Polynesian grapsid\ncrab)\nParacerceis sculpta – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Sponge-dwelling (CCIMPE review)\nisopod)\nParadella dianae – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Sphaleromatid (CCIMPE review)\nisopod)\nPetrolisthes elongatus Watch list – – – NT, NSW – – – Step 2\n(New Zealand\nhalf shell crab)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [pages 46,47,48,49,50]\nning—low impact\n(Sphaleromatid (CCIMPE review)\nisopod)\nPetrolisthes elongatus Watch list – – – NT, NSW – – – Step 2\n(New Zealand\nhalf shell crab)\nPseudodiaptomus – – X – WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\nmarinus (CCIMPE review)\n(Calaniod copepod)\nPyromaia tuberculata – – – – – – X Shane Ahyong Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(American spider feasibly be controlled in the\ncrab) environment\nRhithropanopeus – – X X WA – X Shane Ahyong, Recommended for the APMPL\nharrisii Northern Australia\n(Harris’ mud crab) Priority Pesta\nSphaeroma – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nannandalei feasibly be controlled in the\n(Annandale’s pill bug) environment\nSphaeroma walkeri – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Walker’s pill bug) (CCIMPE review)\nDepartment of Agriculture and Water Resources\n39\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 50]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\n(Australian native\nascidian)\nForsterygion – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nlapillum (CCIMPE review)\n(Common triplefin)\nForsterygion varium – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Variable triplefin) (CCIMPE review)\nNeogobius Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1A)—species is\nmelanostomus exotic NSW, SA, freshwater only\n(Round goby) WA\nSiganus luridus – – X – WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Dusky spinefoot) (CCIMPE review)\nSiganus rivulatus Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1D)—species is not\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n\n## KPIs, Targets, and Where They Are At\n\n- [Page 37]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCandidate species reference sources\nTable E2 Candidate species list for Algae (Chlorophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAvrainvillea – – X – – – – – Initial screening—low impact\namadelpha (biofouling risk assessment)\n(Leather mudweed)\nCaulerpa filiformis – – – – – – X – Initial screening—moderate\n(Green macroalga) impact (CCIMPE review)\nCaulerpa cylindracea – – X – – – – – Step 1 (1B)—species is native\n(Grape algae)\nCaulerpa taxifolia Trigger list: – X – All Exotic X – Step 1 (1B, 1D)—species is\n(Aquarium weed) exotic native and not readily\nidentifiable in the field\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 38]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E3 Candidate species list: Algae (Miozoa)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAlexandrium Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nmonilatum holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Toxic dinoflagellate) exotic environment\nAlexandrium spp. – – X – WA – X – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(A. catenella, feasibly be controlled in the\nA. minutum, environment\nA. tamarense)\n(Toxic dinoflagellate)\nDinophysis Trigger list: – X – NT, WA – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nnorvegica (Toxic holoplankton feasibly be controlled in the\ndinoflagellate) exotic environment\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 39]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E4 Candidate species list: Algae (Ochrophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nChaetoceros Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nconcavicornis holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Centric diatom) exotic environment\nChaetoceros Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 1E—cannot feasibly be\nconvolutus holoplankton WA controlled in the environment)\n(Centric diatom) exotic\nChattonella antiqua – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(Raphidophyte) feasibly be controlled in the\nenvironment\nCorethron pennatum – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n[syn.\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- Table E5 Candidate species list: Algae (Rhodophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nBonnemaisonia – – X – WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\nhamifera (CCIMPE review)\n(Bonnemaison’s\nhook weed)\nGracilaria – – – – – – – John Lewis Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\nvermiculophylla not readily identifiable in the\n(Red macroalga) field, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\nand pathways and vectors\ncannot feasibly be managed\nGrateloupia – – – – – – – John Lewis Step 1 (1J, 1K)—there is likely\nimbricate no national interest in species\n(Forked Grateloup’s management, and established\nweed) populations in Australia are not\nfeasible to eradicate\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- Table E7 Candidate species list: Arthropoda\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nCallinectes sapidus – – X X WA – X Shane Ahyong Step 1 (1F)—pathways and\n(Atlantic blue crab) vectors cannot feasibly be\nmanaged\nCaprella mutica – – – – – – – Richard Willan Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(Japanese skeleton readily identifiable in the field\nshrimp) and cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nCarcinoscorpius – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nrotundicauda feasibly be controlled in the\n(Mangrove horseshoe environment\ncrab)\nCarcinus maenas Trigger list: X X – NT, Qld, Exotic X – Recommended for the APMPL\n(European green established NSW, Tas,\ncrab) SA, WA\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 44]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nCharybdis japonica Trigger list: – X X NT, Qld, – X – Step 2 (criterion 3)—\n(Asian paddle crab) exotic NSW, SA, insufficient negative impacts\nWA from species\nChthamalus proteus – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(Atlantic barnacle) readily identifiable in the field\nand cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nCirolana harfordi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Speckled pill bug) (CCIMPE review)\nCrangonyx floridanus – – – X – – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Florida crangonyctid (biofouling risk assessment)\namphipod)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 45]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nHemigrapsus takanoi Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – Shane Ahyong Step 1 (1D)—species is not\n(Pacific crab) exotic NSW, SA, readily identifiable in the field\nWA\nHesperibalanus fallax – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\n(Warm water not readily identifiable in the\nbarnacle) field, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\nand pathways and vectors\ncannot feasibly be managed\nLaticorophium baconi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(North American (CCIMPE review)\nPacific corophiid)\nLoxothylacus – – – X – – – – Initial screening—parasitic\npanopaei species\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 46]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nMonocorophium – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nsextonae (CCIMPE review)\n(Corophiid amphipod)\nPachygrapsus – – – X WA – – Northern Australia Step 1 (1D)—species is not\nfakaravensi Priority Pesta readily identifiable in the field\n(Polynesian grapsid\ncrab)\nParacerceis sculpta – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Sponge-dwelling (CCIMPE review)\nisopod)\nParadella dianae – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Sphaleromatid (CCIMPE review)\nisopod)\nPetrolisthes elongatus Watch list – – – NT, NSW – – – Step 2\n(New Zealand\nhalf shell crab)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 50]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\n(Australian native\nascidian)\nForsterygion – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nlapillum (CCIMPE review)\n(Common triplefin)\nForsterygion varium – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Variable triplefin) (CCIMPE review)\nNeogobius Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1A)—species is\nmelanostomus exotic NSW, SA, freshwater only\n(Round goby) WA\nSiganus luridus – – X – WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Dusky spinefoot) (CCIMPE review)\nSiganus rivulatus Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1D)—species is not\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 51]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E11 Candidate species list: Cnidaria\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAntennella – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nsecundaria (CCIMPE review)\n(Knotted thread\nhydroid)\nBlackfordia virginica – – X – WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Black sea jelly) (CCIMPE review)\nCarijoa riisei – – – – – – – John Lewis Step 1 (1D)—species is not\nreadily identifiable in the field\nCordylophora caspia – – – – – – X – Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\n(Hydroid) not readily identifiable in the\nfield, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\nand pathways and vectors\ncannot feasibly be managed\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 54]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E15 Candidate species list: Mollusca\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAnadara demiri – – – X WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Ark clam) (biofouling risk assessment)\nAnomia nobilis – – – X WA – – Northern Australia Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\n(Jingle shell) Priority Pest Lista not readily identifiable in the\nfield, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\nand pathways and vectors\ncannot feasibly be managed\nAnteaeolidiella – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nindica (CCIMPE review)\n(Japanese aeolid\nnudibranch)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 55]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nCrepidula fornicata Trigger list: – X X NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(American slipper exotic NSW, SA, readily identifiable in the field\nlimpet) WA and cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nDreissena bugensis – – – X WA – X – Step 1 (1A)—species is\n(Quagga mussel) freshwater only\nDreissena – – – X WA – X – Step 1 (1A)—species is\npolymorpha freshwater only\n(European zebra\nmussel)\nEnsis directus Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Jack knife clam) exotic NSW, SA, (CCIMPE review)\nWA\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 56]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nMagallana gigas – X X – Qld, NSW – X – Step 1 (1L—widely cultivated)\nformerly\nCrassostrea gigas\n(Pacific oyster)\nMaoricolpus roseus Trigger list: – – – NT, Qld, – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(New Zealand established NSW, SA, (CCIMPE review)\nscrewshell) WA\nMya arenaria Trigger list: – X X NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(Soft shell clam) exotic NSW, SA, feasibly be controlled in the\nWA environment\nMytella charruana – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\n(Charru mussel) not readily identifiable in the\nfield, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 57]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nPolycera capensis – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Conspicuous (CCIMPE review)\npolycera\nnudibranch)\nPolycera hedgpethi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Hedgpeth’s dorid (CCIMPE review)\nnudibranch)\nPotamocorbula – X X NT, Qld, Exotic X – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\namurensis NSW, SA, readily identifiable in the field\n(Asian clam) WA and cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nRaeta pulchella – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Beautiful trough (CCIMPE review)\nclam)\nRapana venosa Trigger list: – X X NT, Qld, – X – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n\n## Key Metrics\n\n| Values found | Evidence | Source |\n|---|---|---|\n| $3.5 million, 3.5 million | 4.3 Resourcing\nKey findings – resourcing of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted over $3.5 million in financial investment, however\nmost respondents were not aware of the amount of funding the Plan had attracted.\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted significant in-kind support from all stakeholder\ngroups.\n• Greater stakeholder engagement in a successor plan will improve stakeholder investment\nand achieve outcomes of commo | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $3.5 million, 3.5 million | [pages 17,18,19]\nMarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted over $3.5 million in financial investment, however\nmost respondents were not aware of the amount of funding the Plan had attracted.\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted significant in-kind support from all stakeholder\ngroups.\n• Greater stakeholder engagement in a successor plan will improve stakeholder investment\nand achieve outcomes of common benefit.\n• Increasing awareness of activity outcomes | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $3.5\nmillion, 3.5\nmillion | [Page 18]\nReview of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nexisting funding mechanisms throughout its implementation with DAFF contributing over $3.5\nmillion to the implementation of specific activities (Table 1). | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $3.5 million, 3.5 million | The amount of\nfunding attracted by MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 is comparable to AQUAPLAN 2014-2019, which also\nattracted approximately $3.5 million during its five-year implementation period (see Table 2 in the\nAQUAPLAN 2014-2019 review report). | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $3.5 million, 3.5 million | 7.4 Resourcing\nMarinePestPlan 2018-2023 was successful in attracting more than $3.5 million in funding from the\nAustralian Government to support its implementation. | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $3.5 million, 3.5 million | The Australian Government invested over $3.5 million of direct funding to the implementation of\nMarinePestPlan 2018-2023. | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $14 billion, $100 billion, 14 billion, 100 billion | Australia’s marine tourism industry has an annual Once established, marine pests can rarely be\nvalue of around $14 billion, while marine industries eradicated, and their impacts are often long lasting.\n(for example, commercial fisheries and aquaculture, Preventing the introduction and spread of marine\nand oil and gas extraction) are expected to contribute pests is therefore vital to ensure that the potentially\n$100 billion to the national economy | `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $15,592 | Table 1 Estimated direct financial contributions to the development and implementation\nof MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nDevelopment of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nDevelopment workshops and plan publication $15,592\nImplementation of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nOb 1. | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $1,380,280 | Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment, and $1,380,280\nspread\nOb 2. | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $430,490\n, $3,595,602 | Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pest biosecurity $430,490\nTotal (estimate) $3,595,602\nIn contrast to the funding attracted (Table 1), few respondents (17%) thought that MarinePestPlan\n2018-2023 was effective in attracting financial resources to help implement the agreed priorities\n(Figure 10) and most respondents were unsure or preferred not to answer. | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| $3.5 million, 3.5 million | This may also explain why only 17% of respondents thought the Plan was\nsuccessful in attracting funding when the Plan in fact attracted over $3.5 million. | `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)` |\n| 30 per cent | [Page 16]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\n(relative to native species) on aquaculture in Australia, but interviews of NSW oyster farms indicated\nthat up to 30 per cent of stock inside trays or tumblers may be consumed by the crabs (Epe 2012). | `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)` |\n\n## Key Achievements\n\n- [Page 21]\nReview of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n5 Outcomes of MarinePestPlan 2018-\n2023\nKey findings – outcomes and achievements of MarinePestPlan\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 was successful in achieving its overall outcomes, with 24 out\nof 29 activities completed across the five objectives.\n• The Plan enabled cross-sectoral collaboration and setting national priorities to manage\nmarine pest biosecurity.\n• Despite the plan’s achievements, issues and gaps relating to marine pest biosecurity\nremain and require continued progress.\n• Additional engagement throughout the lifecycle of the Plan will increase awareness,\ninnovation, and cost efficiencies.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2,3]\n[Page 1]\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review 2020\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review\nIntroduction\nThe purpose of this mid-term review (the review) is to document progress on strategic\nobjectives and associated activities in MarinePestPlan 2018–2023.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)`\n- The review addressed these objectives throughout five key phases of the MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\nlifecycle:\n1) Development – including the development process, stakeholder engagement and national\nendorsement\n2) Implementation – including roles and responsibilities, monitoring and prioritisation,\nresourcing and communication\n3) Outcomes and achievements – including the effectiveness of projects within\nMarinePestPlan’s five objectives and significant outcomes and achievements of the Plan\n4) Future approaches for marine pest biosecurity – including the need for a successor plan, and\npriority areas or activities to be included in a successor plan\n5) Considerations for a successor plan – including cooperation, communication, the biosecurity\nthreat landscape, and resourcing.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- 4.4 Communication\nKey findings – communication of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n• Communication on the implementation of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 and its\nachievements was considered effective by less than a majority of stakeholders.\n• Some communication mechanisms were preferred to foster inclusivity among\nstakeholders and effectively communicate updates (e.g., MPSC biannual meetings, web\npage updates).\n• Improved communication should be a priority of a successor plan, including shared\nstakeholder responsibility for communication and a broader range of communication\nactivities.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- Additional messages that should be communicated where appropriate to primary audiences are:\n• Opportunities for collaboration\n• Challenges to progress or complete aspects of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023\n• Transparency of decision making, policy development, pest detections and government action\n• Progress on and completion of activities through MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 or MPSC\ncontributing to marine pest biosecurity issues\n• Changes to MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 Activities.\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- [Page 10]\nTable 2 Secondary engagement activities (non-exhaustive)\nEngagement activity Description Format Distribution/promotion Responsible party Frequency\nMarinePestPlan 2018– Update on MarinePestPlan 2018–2023, Webpage Promotion through MPSC (and other) MPSC Secretariat to Biannually –\n2023 Marine pests informed by the activity progress newsletters, and on MPSC and industry coordinate, project following MPSC\nwebsite page reports webpages leads to provide meetings\nactivity updates\nInformation on Information on MarinePestPlan 2018– Webpage Stakeholders may wish to promote new All Ad hoc – as\nstakeholder websites 2023 and MPSC activities (or links to content on their pages through their own appropriate\nfurther information) displayed on engagement channels opportunities arise\nstakeholder websites for the benefit of\ntheir members and audiences\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- 2018–2023, fact copies of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 have Re-issuing\nsheets, brochures, been printed dependent on\nmagnets and posters) uptake and\ndemand\nWebinar/teleconference Targeted engagement with Webinar or Promoted through newsletters and email MPSC Secretariat to Five times over the\nseries stakeholders on progress and teleconference invitations direct to relevant stakeholders coordinate period of\noutcomes of specific MarinePestPlan (depending on MarinePestPlan\n2018–2023 activities (one for each of facilities and interest) 2018–2023\nthe five objectives)\n2\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- Of the 29 activities listed in\nMarinePestPlan 2028-2023\n, 24 activities were completed, 3 were partially completed, and 2 did not commence.\n Source: `pages/priorities-index__02.html (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/publications/marine-pest-plan)`\n- [Page 22]\nOutcomes for 2022\nSuccessful implementation of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 will seek to deliver important outcomes for\nnational marine pest biosecurity. by identifying the changes that we want to make, we will be able to\nmonitor our progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategic plan.\nthrough MarinePestPlan 2018–2023:\n¬ Marine pest surveillance will be coordinated across jurisdictions and industry sectors.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [Page 42]\nActivity 4.1\nPeriodically review the national marine pest biosecurity research and\ndevelopment priorities\nThe National Priorities for Introduced Marine Pest Research to monitor progress and ensure they remain purposeful.\nand Development 2013–2023 was developed by MPSC in Activity 4.1 will periodically review the list of R&D priorities,\nconsultation with Australian marine scientists, industry generate an audit of R&D being undertaken to address\nand other stakeholders (Marine Pest Sectoral Committee those priorities, and produce a gap analysis to be circulated\n2013).\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [Page 10]\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review 2020\nA parallel department project to validate molecular assays for six exotic marine pest species\nthat are considered high risk has been completed, although only partial validation was achieved\nfor some species and further work is needed to achieve complete validation.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)`\n- [Page 19]\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review 2020\nThe way forward\nMany of the activities in MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 have been completed and have led to\nimproved biosecurity outcomes in marine environments.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)`\n\n## Key Issues, Risks, and Recommendations\n\n- [Page 37]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCandidate species reference sources\nTable E2 Candidate species list for Algae (Chlorophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAvrainvillea – – X – – – – – Initial screening—low impact\namadelpha (biofouling risk assessment)\n(Leather mudweed)\nCaulerpa filiformis – – – – – – X – Initial screening—moderate\n(Green macroalga) impact (CCIMPE review)\nCaulerpa cylindracea – – X – – – – – Step 1 (1B)—species is native\n(Grape algae)\nCaulerpa taxifolia Trigger list: – X – All Exotic X – Step 1 (1B, 1D)—species is\n(Aquarium weed) exotic native and not readily\nidentifiable in the field\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 44]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nCharybdis japonica Trigger list: – X X NT, Qld, – X – Step 2 (criterion 3)—\n(Asian paddle crab) exotic NSW, SA, insufficient negative impacts\nWA from species\nChthamalus proteus – – – X WA – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(Atlantic barnacle) readily identifiable in the field\nand cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nCirolana harfordi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Speckled pill bug) (CCIMPE review)\nCrangonyx floridanus – – – X – – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Florida crangonyctid (biofouling risk assessment)\namphipod)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 54]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E15 Candidate species list: Mollusca\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAnadara demiri – – – X WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Ark clam) (biofouling risk assessment)\nAnomia nobilis – – – X WA – – Northern Australia Step 1 (1D, 1E, 1F)—species is\n(Jingle shell) Priority Pest Lista not readily identifiable in the\nfield, cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment,\nand pathways and vectors\ncannot feasibly be managed\nAnteaeolidiella – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\nindica (CCIMPE review)\n(Japanese aeolid\nnudibranch)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 8]\nSummary of\nObjectives and Activities\nObjective 1: Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread\n1.1 Implement nationally consistent domestic ballast water regulations under the Biosecurity\nAct 2015 (Cwlth)\n1.2 Ensure the use of ballast water management systems in Australian waters meets accepted\nenvironmental standards\n1.3 Investigate regulatory options to manage biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on\nActivities vessels\n1.4 Review the National Biofouling Management Guidelines for marine sectors and update as\nrequired\n1.5 Investigate the benefits of an intelligence-gathering framework to monitor marine pest risk\npathways and expand the International Biosecurity Intelligence System as appropriate\nObjective 2: Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system\n2.1 Develop a national marine pest surveillance strategy\n2.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [Page 9]\nSummary of\nObjectives and Activities\nObjective 3: Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions\n3.1 Plan and implement a national program of marine pest emergency response exercises\n3.2 Develop a benefit–cost analysis framework to guide response efforts in the event of a\nnationally significant marine pest incursion\nActivities 3.3 Identify marine pest emergency response training needs\n3.4 Review the national Emergency Marine Pest Plan (EMPPlan) framework\n3.5 Plan and implement procedures to develop and update the EMPPlan rapid response\nmanuals and related guidance materials\nObjective 4: Support marine pest biosecurity research and development\n4.1 Periodically review the national marine pest biosecurity research and development priorities\n4.2 Promote research coordination through the national marine pest research network\n4.\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- [pages 9,10,11]\n4.4 Conduct risk analyses of marine pest vectors and pathways, and make recommendations\nfor improved management\n4.5 Assess the effectiveness of current management options for biofouling in niche areas\nObjective 5: Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pest biosecurity\n5.1 Identify and build a profile of marine pest biosecurity stakeholders\n5.2 Develop a national stakeholder engagement strategy for MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 and\nthe Marine Pest Sectoral Committee\n5.3 Design a targeted national campaign to improve awareness of marine pest biosecurity\nActivities\nrisks, management actions and shared responsibilities\n5.4 Review, update and maintain the www.marinepests.gov.au website\n5.5 Establish an independent national marine pest network\nSource: James Lavender\nMarinePestPlan 2018–2023 vi\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- Additional messages that should be communicated where appropriate to primary audiences are:\n• Opportunities for collaboration\n• Challenges to progress or complete aspects of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023\n• Transparency of decision making, policy development, pest detections and government action\n• Progress on and completion of activities through MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 or MPSC\ncontributing to marine pest biosecurity issues\n• Changes to MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 Activities.\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- [Page 49]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E10 Candidate species list: Chordata\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAcanthogobius – – – – NSW, Tas, – X – Initial screening—low impact\nflavimanus WA (CCIMPE review)\n(Yellowfin goby)\nAcentrogobius – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\npflaumi (CCIMPE review)\n(Streaked goby)\nAscidiella aspersa – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Solitary ascidian) (CCIMPE review)\nBotrylloides leachi – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Colonial ascidian) (CCIMPE review)\nBotryllus schlosseri – – – – – – X – Initial screening—low impact\n(Star ascidian) (CCIMPE review)\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- 4.4 Conduct risk analyses of marine pest vectors and pathways, and make\nrecommendations for improved management\nTITLE CHANGED\n‘Make recommendations and implement measures to improve management of marine pest\nvectors and pathways.’ (Change agreed at MPSC19)\nRationale for change\nPathways and vectors are very well understood so the prime pathways are well known, and\nmeasures are already under way to manage them (all ballast water and biofouling projects\ncover elements of this issue).\n Source: `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)`\n- The objectives of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 are to:\n1) minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread\n2) strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system\n3) enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions\n4) support marine pest biosecurity research and development\n5) engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests.\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- Other activities of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 contribute to\nengagement objectives to some extent, including, but not limited to:\n• Activity 1.5 — Investigate the benefits of an intelligence-gathering framework to monitor marine\npest risk pathways and expand the International Biosecurity Intelligence System\n• Activity 2.3 — Promote tailored education and awareness materials to engage marine pest\nobserver groups in passive surveillance activities\n• Activity 4.2 — Promote research coordination through the national marine pest research\nnetwork (Marine Biosecurity Research Australia)\n• Activity 5.1 — Identify and build a profile of marine pest biosecurity stakeholders\n• Activity 5.4 — Review, update and maintain www.marinepests.gov.au\n• Activity 5.5 — Establish a national marine pest network (Marine Biosecurity Australia)\n5\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- [Page 38]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E3 Candidate species list: Algae (Miozoa)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nAlexandrium Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nmonilatum holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Toxic dinoflagellate) exotic environment\nAlexandrium spp. – – X – WA – X – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(A. catenella, feasibly be controlled in the\nA. minutum, environment\nA. tamarense)\n(Toxic dinoflagellate)\nDinophysis Trigger list: – X – NT, WA – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nnorvegica (Toxic holoplankton feasibly be controlled in the\ndinoflagellate) exotic environment\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 39]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable E4 Candidate species list: Algae (Ochrophyta)\nCommon name CCIMPE list Marine Marine pest National State or New Zealand NIMPIS Expert Step excluded\nballast monitoring biofouling territory surveillance list list recommendation\nwater DSS target species species of noxious\nlist concern list list\nChaetoceros Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nconcavicornis holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Centric diatom) exotic environment\nChaetoceros Trigger list: – X – NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 1E—cannot feasibly be\nconvolutus holoplankton WA controlled in the environment)\n(Centric diatom) exotic\nChattonella antiqua – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n(Raphidophyte) feasibly be controlled in the\nenvironment\nCorethron pennatum – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\n[syn.\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- Corethron feasibly be controlled in the\ncriophilum] environment\n(Centric diatom)\nFucus evanescens – – – X WA – – – Initial screening—low impact\n(Brown alga) (biofouling risk assessment)\nPseudochattonella – – – X – – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\nfarcimen readily identifiable in the field\n(Raphidophyte) and cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nPseudo-nitzschia Trigger list: X X NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1E)—species cannot\nseriata holoplankton WA feasibly be controlled in the\n(Pennate diatom) exotic environment\nSargassum horneri – – – – – – – Tim Glasby Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(Horner’s readily identifiable in the field\nsargassum) and cannot feasibly be\ncontrolled in the environment\nSargassum muticum Trigger list: X X NT, Qld, – – – Step 1 (1D, 1E)—species is not\n(Wireweed) exotic NSW, SA, readily identifiable in the field\nWA\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n\n## Corporate Values and Operating Culture\n\n- Additional messages that should be communicated where appropriate to primary audiences are:\n• Opportunities for collaboration\n• Challenges to progress or complete aspects of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023\n• Transparency of decision making, policy development, pest detections and government action\n• Progress on and completion of activities through MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 or MPSC\ncontributing to marine pest biosecurity issues\n• Changes to MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 Activities.\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- [Page 21]\nReview of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n5 Outcomes of MarinePestPlan 2018-\n2023\nKey findings – outcomes and achievements of MarinePestPlan\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 was successful in achieving its overall outcomes, with 24 out\nof 29 activities completed across the five objectives.\n• The Plan enabled cross-sectoral collaboration and setting national priorities to manage\nmarine pest biosecurity.\n• Despite the plan’s achievements, issues and gaps relating to marine pest biosecurity\nremain and require continued progress.\n• Additional engagement throughout the lifecycle of the Plan will increase awareness,\ninnovation, and cost efficiencies.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 MarinePestPlan2018-2023 and MPSC activities.\nand the Marine Pest Sectoral\nCommittee\nActivity 5.3 Deliver a targeted Improved awareness of marine pest biosecurity Planning for the national campaign has Partially The national campaign will be implemented\nnational campaign to improve through a targeted campaign of high-risk and commenced, however implementation was complete under the National marine pest surveillance\nawareness of marine pest high-value stakeholder groups. postponed until a baseline assessment of strategy, once a baseline assessment of\nbiosecurity risks, stakeholder knowledge and participation in marine stakeholder knowledge and participation\nmanagement actions and pest biosecurity is undertaken.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- Section 2: Implementation of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n2.1 Roles and responsibilities\nQuestion 5: Stakeholders agreed that the Marine Pest Sectoral Committee (MPSC) would be\nresponsible for coordinating the implementation of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 in collaboration with\nmarine industries and other users of the marine environment.\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)`\n- The objectives of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 are to:\n1) minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread\n2) strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system\n3) enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions\n4) support marine pest biosecurity research and development\n5) engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests.\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- Other activities of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 contribute to\nengagement objectives to some extent, including, but not limited to:\n• Activity 1.5 — Investigate the benefits of an intelligence-gathering framework to monitor marine\npest risk pathways and expand the International Biosecurity Intelligence System\n• Activity 2.3 — Promote tailored education and awareness materials to engage marine pest\nobserver groups in passive surveillance activities\n• Activity 4.2 — Promote research coordination through the national marine pest research\nnetwork (Marine Biosecurity Research Australia)\n• Activity 5.1 — Identify and build a profile of marine pest biosecurity stakeholders\n• Activity 5.4 — Review, update and maintain www.marinepests.gov.au\n• Activity 5.5 — Establish a national marine pest network (Marine Biosecurity Australia)\n5\n Source: `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)`\n- [pages 35,36,37,38,39]\nconcern list extreme impacts on the environment, economy, social/cultural values and/or\nhuman health (Hewitt et al.\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n- [Page 36]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nMarine pest list List details No. of marine\nspecies on list\nQueensland—the Biosecurity Act 2014 (Schedule 1, Part 5) lists prohibited 33\nspecies of marine animals and plants (Queensland Department of Agriculture\nand Fisheries 2017)\nNew South Wales—prohibited matter, including marine pests, is listed in the 40\nBiosecurity Act 2015 (Schedule 2) (Department for Planning and Spaces 2018).\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)`\n\n## Global Ideas and Case Study Inputs\n\n_No global-intelligence source text found yet. Run `CLAUDE/global-ideas-scraper.py ` to populate case-study sources._\n\n## Source Artifacts Used\n\n- `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf` - strategies - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf\n- `pages/homepage.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/partnerships\n- `pages/inquiries-index.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/contact-us\n- `pages/inquiries-index__00.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/contact-us\n- `pages/priorities-index.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/partnerships\n- `pages/priorities-index__01.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/apmpl\n- `pages/priorities-index__02.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/publications/marine-pest-plan\n- `pages/priorities-index__03.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/emergency/emergency-marine-pest-plan\n- `pages/priorities-index__04.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/research/national-priorities\n- `pages/priorities-index__05.html` - pages - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/surveillance/national-marine-pest-surveillance-work-plan\n- `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf` - other-pdfs - https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf\n\n## Gaps To Fix\n\n- No corporate plan text source found.\n- No annual report text source found.\n- No global comparison/case-study sources found.", "legislation_md": "# Marine Pest Sectoral Committee - Acts and Legislation Discovery\n\n**Generated at**: 2026-05-09T21:02:51.511338+00:00\n**Entity ID**: B-003221\n**Jurisdiction**: Commonwealth\n**Portfolio**: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry\n\n> This is an evidence-based discovery list from scraped department material. A mention does not always mean the department administers the legislation; high-confidence and official register links should be reviewed.\n\n## Summary\n\n- Source files scanned: 14\n- Unique legislation references found: 3\n\n| Type | Count |\n|---|---:|\n| Act | 3 |\n\n## Legislation References\n\n### Fisheries Management Act 2007\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: medium\n**Mentions**: 1\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.gov.au/search?query=Fisheries+Management+Act+2007\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- eshwater) (Victorian Fisheries Authority 2010) as determined under section\n75 of the Fisheries Act 1995.\nTasmania—six species are declared as key marine pests in Tasmania. 6\nSouth Australia—noxious fish list: marine pests (PIRSA 2019) as declared 29\nunder the Fisheries Management Act 2007.\nNew Zealand The New Zealand Port Surveillance list contains two parts:\nSurveillance list\n species not established in the country 5\n established species that are geographically restricted. 4\nNote: The number and species on each list is accurate as of 2016,\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pages.jsonl`\n\n### Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: low\n**Mentions**: 2\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.gov.au/search?query=Environment+Protection+and+Biodiversity+Act+1999\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- rogress to Step 3f, and recommendation for the APMPL.\na Relevant impacts are those that are considered to be significant negative consequences, over and above those that occur\ndue to native species. b Protected marine species and communities are listed in the Environment Protection and\nBiodiversity Act 1999. c Ecologically valuable marine species include keystone marine species, such as kelp forests,\nseagrasses, and mangroves. d The Great Barrier Reef is an example of a nationally important place. e RAMSAR-listed\nwetlands are examples of ecologically valuable pl\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pages.jsonl`\n- in the order of greater than\n$10 million per annum in terms of impacts and the pest’s management. g Unlike for Step 1, all criteria are not required to\nbe true for a species to progress to the next step, if applicable impacts are deemed suitably significant.\nThe Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 contains a full list of protected areas and species.\nDepartment of Agriculture and Water Resources\n26\n\n[page 34]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nTable D5 Step 3 Control and management criteria\nCriterion code Criterion Explanatory information\n3A Th\n Source: `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pages.jsonl`\n\n### International Biosecurity Act 2015\n\n**Type**: Act\n**Confidence**: low\n**Mentions**: 1\n**Register search**: https://www.legislation.gov.au/search?query=International+Biosecurity+Act+2015\n\n**Sources**:\n- `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pages.jsonl`\n\n**Evidence contexts**:\n- omes Final outcomes Status Extension activities\nActivity 1.1 Implement Implementation of domestic ballast water In 2017, amendments were made to the Complete Continued monitoring of inspection and\nnationally consistent domestic regulations that align with the International Biosecurity Act 2015, which enabled Australia to compliance rates for the domestic shipping\nballast water regulations Convention for the Control and Management of ratify the BWM Convention. Domestic ballast industry, updates to the Ballast Water Risk\nunder the Biosecurity Act Shi\n Source: `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pages.jsonl`\n\n## Files Scanned\n\n- `pages/homepage.html` (page)\n- `pages/inquiries-index.html` (page)\n- `pages/inquiries-index__00.html` (page)\n- `pages/priorities-index.html` (page)\n- `pages/priorities-index__01.html` (page)\n- `pages/priorities-index__02.html` (page)\n- `pages/priorities-index__03.html` (page)\n- `pages/priorities-index__04.html` (page)\n- `pages/priorities-index__05.html` (page)\n- `other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)", "global_initiatives_md": null, "strategy": { "reporting_period": "2024-25", "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26", "vision": null, "vision_source_page": null, "purposes": null, "purposes_source_page": null, "how_we_deliver": null, "how_we_deliver_source_page": null, "government_priorities": [], "outcomes": [ { "name": "Outcome 1: Marine Pest Biosecurity", "description": "To maintain Australia’s healthy and resilient marine environment that is protected from the threat of marine pests, and which supports our economy and social amenity.", "key_activities": [ "Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread", "Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system", "Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability for marine pest introductions", "Support marine pest biosecurity research and development", "Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests" ], "source_page": 3 } ], "values": [ "Collaboration", "Transparency", "Preparedness", "Research and Development" ], "values_framework_name": "National Marine Pest Biosecurity Strategy", "kpi_targets_2025_26": [ { "code": "MPE01", "measure": "Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions", "target": "Stability or improvement", "source_page": 5 }, { "code": "MPE02", "measure": "Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system", "target": "Stability or improvement", "source_page": 5 }, { "code": "MPE03", "measure": "Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability", "target": "Stability or improvement", "source_page": 5 }, { "code": "MPE04", "measure": "Support marine pest biosecurity research and development", "target": "Stability or improvement", "source_page": 5 }, { "code": "MPE05", "measure": "Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests", "target": "Stability or improvement", "source_page": 5 } ], "kpi_results_2024_25": [ { "code": "MPE01", "measure": "Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions", "result": "Partially achieved", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE02", "measure": "Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system", "result": "Mostly achieved", "status": "Mostly achieved", "source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE03", "measure": "Enhance Australia’s preparedness and response capability", "result": "Partially achieved", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE04", "measure": "Support marine pest biosecurity research and development", "result": "Stably achieved", "status": "Stably achieved", "source_page": 12 }, { "code": "MPE05", "measure": "Engage stakeholders to better manage marine pests", "result": "Partially achieved", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 12 } ], "_source_urls": { "annual_report_url": "", "corporate_plan_url": "" } }, "ideas": [ { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "small", "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners", "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.", "quote": "[Page 21]\nReview of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n5 Outcomes of MarinePestPlan 2018-\n2023\nKey findings – outcomes and achievements of MarinePestPlan\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 was successful in achieving its overall outcomes, with 24 out\nof 29 activities completed across the five objectives.\n• The Plan enabled cross-sectoral collaboration and setting national priorities to manage\nmarine pest biosecurity.\n• Despite the plan’s achievements, issues and gaps relating to marine pest biosecurity\nremain and require continued progress.\n• Additional engagement throughout the lifecycle of the Plan will increase awareness,\ninnovation, and cost efficiencies.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "large", "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact", "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "[Page 21]\nReview of MarinePestPlan 2018-2023\n5 Outcomes of MarinePestPlan 2018-\n2023\nKey findings – outcomes and achievements of MarinePestPlan\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 was successful in achieving its overall outcomes, with 24 out\nof 29 activities completed across the five objectives.\n• The Plan enabled cross-sectoral collaboration and setting national priorities to manage\nmarine pest biosecurity.\n• Despite the plan’s achievements, issues and gaps relating to marine pest biosecurity\nremain and require continued progress.\n• Additional engagement throughout the lifecycle of the Plan will increase awareness,\ninnovation, and cost efficiencies.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Citizen Participation", "scale": "small", "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking", "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.", "quote": "[Page 10]\nTable 2 Secondary engagement activities (non-exhaustive)\nEngagement activity Description Format Distribution/promotion Responsible party Frequency\nMarinePestPlan 2018– Update on MarinePestPlan 2018–2023, Webpage Promotion through MPSC (and other) MPSC Secretariat to Biannually –\n2023 Marine pests informed by the activity progress newsletters, and on MPSC and industry coordinate, project following MPSC\nwebsite page reports webpages leads to provide meetings\nactivity updates\nInformation on Information on MarinePestPlan 2018– Webpage Stakeholders may wish to promote new All Ad hoc – as\nstakeholder websites 2023 and MPSC activities (or links to content on their pages through their own appropriate\nfurther information) displayed on engagement channels opportunities arise\nstakeholder websites for the benefit of\ntheir members and audiences", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams", "source": "strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Citizen Participation", "scale": "large", "title": "Always-on policy participation platform", "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.", "quote": "[Page 10]\nTable 2 Secondary engagement activities (non-exhaustive)\nEngagement activity Description Format Distribution/promotion Responsible party Frequency\nMarinePestPlan 2018– Update on MarinePestPlan 2018–2023, Webpage Promotion through MPSC (and other) MPSC Secretariat to Biannually –\n2023 Marine pests informed by the activity progress newsletters, and on MPSC and industry coordinate, project following MPSC\nwebsite page reports webpages leads to provide meetings\nactivity updates\nInformation on Information on MarinePestPlan 2018– Webpage Stakeholders may wish to promote new All Ad hoc – as\nstakeholder websites 2023 and MPSC activities (or links to content on their pages through their own appropriate\nfurther information) displayed on engagement channels opportunities arise\nstakeholder websites for the benefit of\ntheir members and audiences", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams", "source": "strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "small", "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries", "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.", "quote": "4.4 Conduct risk analyses of marine pest vectors and pathways, and make\nrecommendations for improved management\nTITLE CHANGED\n‘Make recommendations and implement measures to improve management of marine pest\nvectors and pathways.’ (Change agreed at MPSC19)\nRationale for change\nPathways and vectors are very well understood so the prime pathways are well known, and\nmeasures are already under way to manage them (all ballast water and biofouling projects\ncover elements of this issue).", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "large", "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system", "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.", "quote": "4.4 Conduct risk analyses of marine pest vectors and pathways, and make\nrecommendations for improved management\nTITLE CHANGED\n‘Make recommendations and implement measures to improve management of marine pest\nvectors and pathways.’ (Change agreed at MPSC19)\nRationale for change\nPathways and vectors are very well understood so the prime pathways are well known, and\nmeasures are already under way to manage them (all ballast water and biofouling projects\ncover elements of this issue).", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "small", "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases", "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.", "quote": "[Page 113]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nHemigrapsus takanoi\nPhylum: Arthropoda\nCommon name: Takano’s shore crab\nStatus: Exotic\nAssessed by Tim Glasby; reviewed by Jessica Evans\nTable G31 Step 1 assessment for Hemigrapsus takanoi\nCriterion code Criterion True or false Justification\n1A The species is not freshwater for the whole of True Hemigrapsus takanoi has a salinity tolerance of between 0 ppt and 40 ppt and lives in lives in rocky\nits life. intertidal and muddy subtidal environments (NIMPIS 2017i).", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "large", "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign", "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.", "quote": "[Page 113]\nAustralian Priority Marine Pest List report\nHemigrapsus takanoi\nPhylum: Arthropoda\nCommon name: Takano’s shore crab\nStatus: Exotic\nAssessed by Tim Glasby; reviewed by Jessica Evans\nTable G31 Step 1 assessment for Hemigrapsus takanoi\nCriterion code Criterion True or false Justification\n1A The species is not freshwater for the whole of True Hemigrapsus takanoi has a salinity tolerance of between 0 ppt and 40 ppt and lives in lives in rocky\nits life. intertidal and muddy subtidal environments (NIMPIS 2017i).", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "small", "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting", "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.", "quote": "[Page 8]\nSummary of\nObjectives and Activities\nObjective 1: Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread\n1.1 Implement nationally consistent domestic ballast water regulations under the Biosecurity\nAct 2015 (Cwlth)\n1.2 Ensure the use of ballast water management systems in Australian waters meets accepted\nenvironmental standards\n1.3 Investigate regulatory options to manage biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on\nActivities vessels\n1.4 Review the National Biofouling Management Guidelines for marine sectors and update as\nrequired\n1.5 Investigate the benefits of an intelligence-gathering framework to monitor marine pest risk\npathways and expand the International Biosecurity Intelligence System as appropriate\nObjective 2: Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system\n2.1 Develop a national marine pest surveillance strategy\n2.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "large", "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops", "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.", "quote": "[Page 8]\nSummary of\nObjectives and Activities\nObjective 1: Minimise the risk of marine pest introductions, establishment and spread\n1.1 Implement nationally consistent domestic ballast water regulations under the Biosecurity\nAct 2015 (Cwlth)\n1.2 Ensure the use of ballast water management systems in Australian waters meets accepted\nenvironmental standards\n1.3 Investigate regulatory options to manage biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on\nActivities vessels\n1.4 Review the National Biofouling Management Guidelines for marine sectors and update as\nrequired\n1.5 Investigate the benefits of an intelligence-gathering framework to monitor marine pest risk\npathways and expand the International Biosecurity Intelligence System as appropriate\nObjective 2: Strengthen the national marine pest surveillance system\n2.1 Develop a national marine pest surveillance strategy\n2.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "small", "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases", "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.", "quote": "[pages 17,18,19]\nMarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted over $3.5 million in financial investment, however\nmost respondents were not aware of the amount of funding the Plan had attracted.\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted significant in-kind support from all stakeholder\ngroups.\n• Greater stakeholder engagement in a successor plan will improve stakeholder investment\nand achieve outcomes of common benefit.\n• Increasing awareness of activity outcomes and recognition of task group member\ncontributions could increase stakeholder organisation support of a successor plan.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "large", "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments", "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "[pages 17,18,19]\nMarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted over $3.5 million in financial investment, however\nmost respondents were not aware of the amount of funding the Plan had attracted.\n• MarinePestPlan 2018-2023 attracted significant in-kind support from all stakeholder\ngroups.\n• Greater stakeholder engagement in a successor plan will improve stakeholder investment\nand achieve outcomes of common benefit.\n• Increasing awareness of activity outcomes and recognition of task group member\ncontributions could increase stakeholder organisation support of a successor plan.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf (https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] } ], "legislation_administered": [], "artifacts": [ { "category": "strategies", "year": null, "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "file": "strategies/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "bytes": 455972, "link_text": "National marine pest stakeholder engagement strategy (PDF 442 KB)" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/apmpl-process-outcomes.pdf", "bytes": 2731283, "link_text": "Australian Priority Marine Pest List: Process and outcomes (PDF 2.6 MB)" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2018", "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-2023.pdf", "bytes": 6905040, "link_text": "MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 (PDF 6.59 MB)" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2018", "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/marine-pest-plan-2018-23-mid-term-review.pdf", "bytes": 469481, "link_text": "MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 mid-term review (PDF 456 KB)" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2018", "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/review-marinepestplan-2018-2023.pdf", "bytes": 720605, "link_text": "Review of MarinePestPlan 2018–2023 (PDF 699 KB)" } ], "_meta": { "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-13T11:02:54+00:00", "strategy_brief_meta": { "model": "nova-micro", "folder": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "annual_report": { "file": null, "url": "", "year": null }, "corporate_plan": { "file": "strategies\\national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.txt", "url": "https://www.marinepests.gov.au/sites/default/files/Documents/national_marine_pest_stakeholder_engagement_strategy.pdf", "year": null }, "usage": { "input_tokens": 7849, "output_tokens": 835, "total_tokens": 8684, "model": "nova-micro" }, "cost_usd": 0.00039161500000000005, "elapsed_seconds": 4.01, "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:17:28+00:00" }, "ideas_manifest": { "entity_id": "B-003221", "entity_name": "Marine Pest Sectoral Committee", "folder_name": "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee", "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:19.478106+00:00", "idea_count": 12, "markdown": "ideas/Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee_ideas.md", "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl", "inputs": [ "Marine-Pest-Sectoral-Committee_strategy-overview.md", "strategy-evidence.json", "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json" ] }, "global_intel_meta": null } }