{ "entity_id": "B-002166", "folder": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "type": "Ministerial Council", "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth", "portfolio": "Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry", "website": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/about-aclump", "data_status": "partial", "completeness": { "has_strategy_brief": true, "has_strategy_structured": true, "has_vision": true, "has_kpi_targets": true, "has_kpi_results": true, "has_strategy_overview": true, "has_legislation_text": true, "has_legislation_structured": false, "has_global_initiatives_text": false, "has_ideas": true, "has_artifacts": true, "n_ideas": 12, "n_legislation": 0, "n_artifacts": 8, "n_kpi_targets": 3, "n_kpi_results": 3, "n_outcomes": 4, "verified_own_data": true }, "strategy_profile": { "status": "needs_review", "confidence": "medium", "summary": "To provide leadership and strategic direction to the development of integrated land information and mapping built on complementary national and state approaches through the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP).", "official_site_url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/about-aclump", "source_documents": [ { "type": "strategie", "title": "Strategic Plan 2024-2029", "url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "period": "2024", "confidence": "medium" }, { "type": "strategie", "title": "Land Use Mapping for the Murray-Darling Basin: 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000 maps. Baseline land use profiles to support the implementation of the basin Salinity Manag", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf", "period": "2000", "confidence": "medium" }, { "type": "strategie", "title": "Technical Bulletin: Regional Land Use Mapping using Satellite AVHRR Data, 2003", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf", "period": "2003", "confidence": "medium" } ], "purpose": { "text": "To provide leadership and strategic direction to the development of integrated land information and mapping built on complementary national and state approaches through the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP).", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, "vision": { "text": "ACLUMP’s geospatial data products for land use, land cover and land management practices, are well-known, trusted and used to inform decisions that impact Australia’s economic, environmental and social prosperity.", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, "strategic_priorities": [ { "title": "National framework for integrated land information and mapping program", "description": "National framework for integrated land information and mapping program", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "title": "Land information that meets policy, management needs", "description": "Land information that meets policy, management needs", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "title": "National, regional and industry stakeholders use our land information", "description": "National, regional and industry stakeholders use our land information", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "title": "Cooperation and capacity for land information collation, mapping and analysis is increased", "description": "Cooperation and capacity for land information collation, mapping and analysis is increased", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "title": "New partnerships and technologies are explored for land information", "description": "New partnerships and technologies are explored for land information", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" } ], "values": [ { "name": "Leadership", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Collaboration", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Innovation", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Integrity", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": null } ], "outcomes": [ { "name": "Outcome 1: National framework for integrated land information and mapping program", "description": "The Australian Land Use and Management Classification continues to evolve in response to user needs.", "activities": [ "National guidelines for a consistent approach to land use mapping", "National standards" ], "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "name": "Outcome 2: Land use mapping is comprehensive, accurate, current and at an appropriate scale", "description": "Land use mapping is comprehensive, accurate, current and at an appropriate scale.", "activities": [ "Field apps, web apps and ‘Land use live’ tools are used by stakeholders", "Technical workshops held" ], "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "name": "Outcome 3: Geospatial data is available as web services", "description": "Geospatial data is available as web services stakeholders for data provision.", "activities": [ "Agreements established with stakeholders for data provision" ], "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" }, { "name": "Outcome 4: New partnerships established", "description": "New partnerships established.", "activities": [ "New methods and technologies incorporated in national standards" ], "source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "source_page": 1, "source_deep_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1" } ], "performance_measures": [ { "code": "LUMI01", "measure": "Number of national standards developed", "target": "5", "latest_result": "4", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "target_source_page": 1, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 1 }, { "code": "LUMI02", "measure": "Number of technical workshops held", "target": "3", "latest_result": "2", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "target_source_page": 1, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 1 }, { "code": "LUMI03", "measure": "Number of new partnerships established", "target": "2", "latest_result": "1", "status": "Not achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "target_source_page": 1, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 1 } ], "document_alignment_terms": { "must_support": [ "To provide leadership and strategic direction to the development of integrated land information and mapping built on complementary national and state approaches through the Austral", "ACLUMP’s geospatial data products for land use, land cover and land management practices, are well-known, trusted and used to inform decisions that impact Australia’s economic, env", "National framework for integrated land information and mapping program", "Land information that meets policy, management needs", "National, regional and industry stakeholders use our land information", "Cooperation and capacity for land information collation, mapping and analysis is increased", "New partnerships and technologies are explored for land information" ], "watch_terms": [ "Number of national standards developed", "Number of technical workshops held", "Number of new partnerships established" ], "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": [] }, "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete." }, "strategy_brief_md": "# National Committee for Land Use and Management Information — Strategy Brief\n\n**Reporting period**: 2024-25\n**Corporate plan in force**: 2025-26\n**Corporate Plan**: [2025-26](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf)\n\n## Vision\n\n> ACLUMP’s geospatial data products for land use, land cover and land management practices, are well-known, trusted and used to inform decisions that impact Australia’s economic, environmental and social prosperity. [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n## Our purpose / purposes\n\n> To provide leadership and strategic direction to the development of integrated land information and mapping built on complementary national and state approaches through the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP). [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n## How we deliver\n\n> National collaborative network ready to mobilise resources; Provide coordinated national technical advice; Facilitate access to our land information; Facilitate capability development; Encourage and facilitate development of new partnerships between land information providers, users and coordinators. [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n## Government priorities for this department\n\n- National framework for integrated land information and mapping program [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n- Land information that meets policy, management needs [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n- National, regional and industry stakeholders use our land information [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n- Cooperation and capacity for land information collation, mapping and analysis is increased [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n- New partnerships and technologies are explored for land information [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n## Outcomes\n\n### Outcome 1: National framework for integrated land information and mapping program\nThe Australian Land Use and Management Classification continues to evolve in response to user needs. [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n**Key activities:**\n- National guidelines for a consistent approach to land use mapping\n- National standards\n\n### Outcome 2: Land use mapping is comprehensive, accurate, current and at an appropriate scale\nLand use mapping is comprehensive, accurate, current and at an appropriate scale. [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n**Key activities:**\n- Field apps, web apps and ‘Land use live’ tools are used by stakeholders\n- Technical workshops held\n\n### Outcome 3: Geospatial data is available as web services\nGeospatial data is available as web services stakeholders for data provision. [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n**Key activities:**\n- Agreements established with stakeholders for data provision\n\n### Outcome 4: New partnerships established\nNew partnerships established. [[CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1)]\n\n**Key activities:**\n- New methods and technologies incorporated in national standards\n\n## Values and principles\n\n_NCLUMI Values_\n\n- Leadership\n- Collaboration\n- Innovation\n- Integrity\n\n## What they will measure themselves on this year (targets from 2025-26 corporate plan)\n\n| Code | Measure | Target | Source |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LUMI01 | Number of national standards developed | 5 | [CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1) |\n| LUMI02 | Number of technical workshops held | 3 | [CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1) |\n| LUMI03 | Number of new partnerships established | 2 | [CP p.1](https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf#page=1) |\n\n## How they performed last year (results from 2024-25 annual report)\n\n| Code | Measure | Result | Status | Source |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| LUMI01 | Number of national standards developed | 4 | Partially achieved | AR p.1 |\n| LUMI02 | Number of technical workshops held | 2 | Partially achieved | AR p.1 |\n| LUMI03 | Number of new partnerships established | 1 | Not achieved | AR p.1 |", "strategy_overview_evidence_md": null, "internal_strategy_evidence_md": "# National Committee for Land Use and Management Information - Strategy, Performance, and Operating Profile\n\n**Generated at**: 2026-05-09T22:14:39.286630+00:00\n**Entity ID**: B-002166\n**Entity type**: Ministerial Council\n**Jurisdiction**: Commonwealth\n**Portfolio**: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry\n**Website**: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/about-aclump\n\n> Draft generated from scraped source material. Treat this as an evidence pack for editorial review, not a final judgement.\n\n## Source Coverage\n\n| Source type | Count |\n|---|---:|\n| other-pdfs | 4 |\n| pages | 7 |\n| reviews | 1 |\n| strategies | 3 |\n\n## Executive Readout\n\n### Purpose\n\n- Testing and verification of results .........................................................................24\n5.1 Objective ........................................................................................................24\n5.2 TAGALUM discussion on SPREAD initial outputs. .......................................24\nKey issues.........................................................................................................24\nImprovements to land use allocation methods ...................................................25\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-Darling Basin 1993 - 2001 5\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- The requirement for regional land use mapping (both historical and current)\nLand use mapping has many applications relevant to national scale issues that include:\n(cid:131) Supporting information on diversity of environment and related patterns in economic use of land (e.g. risk\nassessment of land use with climate reliability projections; relating land use to social factors)\n(cid:131) Strategic industry-based planning\n(cid:131) Integrating with other data sets to allow multi-objective assessment on land use and land use change\n(cid:131) Background information products to inform decision-making and assist in the presentation of policy proposals\nMethod for regional land use mapping\nNational agricultural statistics and time-series satellite NOAA-AVHRR data is being used as a primary input for a\nmethod of generating regional land-use maps across Australia.\n Source: `strategies/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf)`\n- Digital boundary data for Stage 1 of the Ord River Irrigation Area supplied by\nAgriculture WA were used for this purpose.16 Without this constraint, SPREAD was found to allocate\n4300 ha (of a total of 6100 ha) of irrigated agriculture to target zones outside the Ord River Irrigation\nArea, which is inconsistent with the known distribution of irrigated agriculture in the SLA.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Bin\n10 represents probabilities of 0.9 – 1.0\nProbability Crops Pastures\nNLUM Bin t1 t2 t5 t6 t7 t1 t2 t5 t6 t7\n1 33255 33103 41220 36731 30031 516 0 4088 1606 541\n2 6501 6062 2355 3765 7081 452 0 1245 481 228\n3 5330 6943 1439 3153 5822 512 2 984 438 186\n4 3369 6522 1102 2502 4770 933 29 928 529 280\n5 3063 2053 939 1084 2288 1770 402 924 747 983\n6 1234 140 867 614 621 3379 3839 979 1636 3200\n7 815 11 949 486 220 3792 6719 1188 2866 5496\n8 466 0 1028 438 214 6118 6995 1624 3372 5909\n9 499 0 1430 557 237 6726 8760 3502 4557 7930\n10 302 0 3505 1379 436 30636 28088 39372 34477 26967\n5.5 Conclusions\nVerification and accuracy testing of the NLUM SPREAD data has been achieved using\ncatchment scale land-use data (CLUM).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n\n### Role and Functions\n\n- Bin\n10 represents probabilities of 0.9 – 1.0\nProbability Crops Pastures\nNLUM Bin t1 t2 t5 t6 t7 t1 t2 t5 t6 t7\n1 33255 33103 41220 36731 30031 516 0 4088 1606 541\n2 6501 6062 2355 3765 7081 452 0 1245 481 228\n3 5330 6943 1439 3153 5822 512 2 984 438 186\n4 3369 6522 1102 2502 4770 933 29 928 529 280\n5 3063 2053 939 1084 2288 1770 402 924 747 983\n6 1234 140 867 614 621 3379 3839 979 1636 3200\n7 815 11 949 486 220 3792 6719 1188 2866 5496\n8 466 0 1028 438 214 6118 6995 1624 3372 5909\n9 499 0 1430 557 237 6726 8760 3502 4557 7930\n10 302 0 3505 1379 436 30636 28088 39372 34477 26967\n5.5 Conclusions\nVerification and accuracy testing of the NLUM SPREAD data has been achieved using\ncatchment scale land-use data (CLUM).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- [pages 42,43,44,45,46]\nshowing post-scaling total commodity area as a function of Q.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- The loss of sensor sensitivity was\nestimated from an “invariant” target site in the Lybian desert over a three year period (equations 8 and\n9 in \"Revised post-launch calibration of channels 1 and 2 of the Advanced Very High Resolution\nRadiometer on board the NOAA-14 spacecraft\" by Rao and Chen published on the NOAA website at\nhttp://psbsgi1.nesdis.noaa.gov:8080/EBB/ml/niccal1.html).\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- It interprets combinations of input layer values in terms of their land use according to the\n10\nusing the ARC/INFO GRID function 'combine'\n11\nin the value attribute table (vat)\n12\nwritten in ARC Macro Language (AML)\n17\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2,3,4]\n[Page 1]\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-\nDarling Basin: 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000\nmaps\nBaseline land use profiles to support the implementation of\nthe basin Salinity Management Strategy\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n\n### Strategic Priorities\n\n- Bin\n10 represents probabilities of 0.9 – 1.0\nProbability Crops Pastures\nNLUM Bin t1 t2 t5 t6 t7 t1 t2 t5 t6 t7\n1 33255 33103 41220 36731 30031 516 0 4088 1606 541\n2 6501 6062 2355 3765 7081 452 0 1245 481 228\n3 5330 6943 1439 3153 5822 512 2 984 438 186\n4 3369 6522 1102 2502 4770 933 29 928 529 280\n5 3063 2053 939 1084 2288 1770 402 924 747 983\n6 1234 140 867 614 621 3379 3839 979 1636 3200\n7 815 11 949 486 220 3792 6719 1188 2866 5496\n8 466 0 1028 438 214 6118 6995 1624 3372 5909\n9 499 0 1430 557 237 6726 8760 3502 4557 7930\n10 302 0 3505 1379 436 30636 28088 39372 34477 26967\n5.5 Conclusions\nVerification and accuracy testing of the NLUM SPREAD data has been achieved using\ncatchment scale land-use data (CLUM).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- The loss of sensor sensitivity was\nestimated from an “invariant” target site in the Lybian desert over a three year period (equations 8 and\n9 in \"Revised post-launch calibration of channels 1 and 2 of the Advanced Very High Resolution\nRadiometer on board the NOAA-14 spacecraft\" by Rao and Chen published on the NOAA website at\nhttp://psbsgi1.nesdis.noaa.gov:8080/EBB/ml/niccal1.html).\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2,3,4]\n[Page 1]\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-\nDarling Basin: 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000\nmaps\nBaseline land use profiles to support the implementation of\nthe basin Salinity Management Strategy\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Outputs for the years 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000\nwere achieved by spatially assigning statistical agricultural census data using the established\nSpatial Reallocation of Aggregated Data (SPREAD) method.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- This project addresses the\nrequirements for baseline land use conditions a 1 January 2000 (Year 2000 map); and\nunderpins understanding of the variability in baseline conditions over the 25 year benchmark\nperiod 1975 – 2000 (Year, 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000 maps plus concorded SLA statistics\n1983-2000)\nThe aims of the current project were to implement the already established SPREAD\nprocedure for mapping the MDB for the required period and also to include the newly\ndeveloped SPREAD II probability mapping.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Land use mapping methodology ...........................................................................10\n2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................10\n2.2 Input data........................................................................................................10\nNDVI imagery ..................................................................................................10\nAgStats data......................................................................................................11\nControl sites......................................................................................................12\nTopographic data ..............................................................................................12\nTenure data..............................................................................\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Field control-site AVHRR NDVI signatures for Land-Use categories...................18\n4.1 Control site data -background .........................................................................18\n4.2 Control site AVHRR-NDVI signature profiles ................................................18\nThe problem of noise from mixed land-use .......................................................18\n4.3 Yearly AVHRR-NDVI averages .....................................................................19\nVariation of average profiles within Audit commodity classes ..........................20\nSimilarities between commodity profiles and potential mis-classification due to\nmixing ..............................................................................................................21\n4.4 Climatic differences in NDVI signatures.........................................................22\n5.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Testing and verification of results .........................................................................24\n5.1 Objective ........................................................................................................24\n5.2 TAGALUM discussion on SPREAD initial outputs. .......................................24\nKey issues.........................................................................................................24\nImprovements to land use allocation methods ...................................................25\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-Darling Basin 1993 - 2001 5\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- [pages 5,6]\n...........................................................................................21\n4.4 Climatic differences in NDVI signatures.........................................................22\n5.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n\n## KPIs, Targets, and Where They Are At\n\n- Bin\n10 represents probabilities of 0.9 – 1.0\nProbability Crops Pastures\nNLUM Bin t1 t2 t5 t6 t7 t1 t2 t5 t6 t7\n1 33255 33103 41220 36731 30031 516 0 4088 1606 541\n2 6501 6062 2355 3765 7081 452 0 1245 481 228\n3 5330 6943 1439 3153 5822 512 2 984 438 186\n4 3369 6522 1102 2502 4770 933 29 928 529 280\n5 3063 2053 939 1084 2288 1770 402 924 747 983\n6 1234 140 867 614 621 3379 3839 979 1636 3200\n7 815 11 949 486 220 3792 6719 1188 2866 5496\n8 466 0 1028 438 214 6118 6995 1624 3372 5909\n9 499 0 1430 557 237 6726 8760 3502 4557 7930\n10 302 0 3505 1379 436 30636 28088 39372 34477 26967\n5.5 Conclusions\nVerification and accuracy testing of the NLUM SPREAD data has been achieved using\ncatchment scale land-use data (CLUM).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- The loss of sensor sensitivity was\nestimated from an “invariant” target site in the Lybian desert over a three year period (equations 8 and\n9 in \"Revised post-launch calibration of channels 1 and 2 of the Advanced Very High Resolution\nRadiometer on board the NOAA-14 spacecraft\" by Rao and Chen published on the NOAA website at\nhttp://psbsgi1.nesdis.noaa.gov:8080/EBB/ml/niccal1.html).\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Outputs for the years 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000\nwere achieved by spatially assigning statistical agricultural census data using the established\nSpatial Reallocation of Aggregated Data (SPREAD) method.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Digital boundary data for Stage 1 of the Ord River Irrigation Area supplied by\nAgriculture WA were used for this purpose.16 Without this constraint, SPREAD was found to allocate\n4300 ha (of a total of 6100 ha) of irrigated agriculture to target zones outside the Ord River Irrigation\nArea, which is inconsistent with the known distribution of irrigated agriculture in the SLA.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Comparisons of the images with raster coastline data sets referred to the Australian\nGeodetic Datum 1966 (AGD66) and the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) showed marginally\nbetter agreement with WGS84 and it is assumed the datum used.1\nThe target zones for SPREAD were defined as individual pixels in the NDVI images.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- This is achieved by comparing the NDVI profiles of target zones and control sites.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [pages 4,5]\nmapping, the verification results indicate that reasonable\naccuracies are being achieved at primary levels of classification (i.e. cropping, pastures) and\nalso for some commodities at crop-type level (e.g. cotton).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Improvements to the 4 key inaccuracies listed above were achieved by the\nemploying the following approaches:\n1.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- In Figure 5.12 (a) the T2 test\nprobabilities are lower than the other tests but the linear result and the 90% accuracy of the\nhighest probabilities for both crops and pastures indicate that this test has produced the best\nresults and that the range of probability values are realistic.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- This was achieved using existing data sets (namely tenure, forestry,\nprotected areas and topographical features) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) AgStats\n96/97 with assistance from a time series of AVHRR remotely sensed imagery.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- The threshold value of 366 ha was chosen because it is approximately\nthe area of three of the largest target zones - the largest target zone is a little smaller than 122 ha.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2,3,4]\n[Page 1]\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-\nDarling Basin: 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000\nmaps\nBaseline land use profiles to support the implementation of\nthe basin Salinity Management Strategy\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- This project addresses the\nrequirements for baseline land use conditions a 1 January 2000 (Year 2000 map); and\nunderpins understanding of the variability in baseline conditions over the 25 year benchmark\nperiod 1975 – 2000 (Year, 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000 maps plus concorded SLA statistics\n1983-2000)\nThe aims of the current project were to implement the already established SPREAD\nprocedure for mapping the MDB for the required period and also to include the newly\ndeveloped SPREAD II probability mapping.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n\n## Key Metrics\n\n| Values found | Evidence | Source |\n|---|---|---|\n| $500 , $10 , $200 | For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000. | `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)` |\n| $100 billion, 100 billion | News and media\nFeatured\nABARES Outlook 2026 - a forum to exchange and test ideas\nMedia release\nFarming\n30 October 2025\nTickets are now on sale for ABARES Outlook 2026, the Bureau’s flagship annual conference taking…\nRecord highs as ag, fish and forestry sectors crack $100 billion\nMedia release\nABARES\n02 September 2025\nAustralia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry production is expected to hit a record combined…\nNew data confirms broadacre farml | `pages/news-latest.html (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/news)` |\n| 1 million, 2.5 million | Choice of land use methods and suggestions for the future\nSome considerations for future land use mapping are as follows:\nß The investment of the NLWRA in the Land Use Mapping of the Continent Using AVHRR Data\nproject, resulted in a land use map at a scale ranging from 1:1 million to 1:2.5 million, costing\napproximately 12.5 cents km-2.\nß To re-run the AVHRR-based method is estimated to cost between 3.3 and 13 cents km-2.\nß Detailed land use mapp | `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)` |\n| $1 , $250 | An upper estimate to re-run the AVHRR-based method is $1 000 000 (about 13 cents km-2) whereas a\nlower estimate is $250 000 (about 3.3 cents km-2). | `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)` |\n| 4.7 million | 2001/02 Land Use of Australia, Version 3 (Bureau of Rural Sciences)\nAccording to this dataset, in 2001/02 the total area of land under primary production (livestock grazing, dryland and\nirrigated agriculture) was nearly 4.7 million square kilometres or 61% of the continent. | `other-pdfs/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf)` |\n| $1 | If a total cost of $1 400 000 is used then this represents a cost of about 50 cents\nkm-2. | `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)` |\n| 4.7 million | This difficulty was overcome using the Australian Land Tenure (Australian Surveying and Land\nInformation Group, 1993) a 1:4.7 million scale national vector data set.8\nThe NFI tenure data set has slivers with missing or incorrect attributes resulting from state border\nmismatches. | `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)` |\n| $500 , $10 , $200 | For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000. | `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)` |\n\n## Key Achievements\n\n- [Page 45]\nWATER\nWATER Lakes\nWATER Surface\nWATER Wetlands\nNorth Bounding Latitude\n-24.485\nSouth Bounding Latitude\n-37.785\nEast Bounding Longitude\n152.585\nWest Bounding Longitude\n138.475\nBeginning Date\n1993-04\nEnding Date\n2003-08\nProgress\nComplete\nMaintenance and Update Frequency\nAs required\nStored Data Set Format\nDIGITAL ARC/INFO 8.2 under SunOS\nAvailable Format Type\nDIGITAL - ARC/INFO raster\nAccess Constraint\nAccess is unrestricted.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- The principle of 'prime use' is\n/* implemented for those data layers of equivalent reliability.\n/*\n/*\n/* LAYERS IN THE LAND USE GRID IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE/ASSIGNMENT\n/* (See metadata and user guide for 1996/97 Land Use of Australia,\n/* Version 2 or final report (Stewart et al, 2001))\n/*\n/* 1. prot_areas = Australian protected areas that meet the World\n/* Conservation Union guidelines (formerly the International\n/* Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources)\n102\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [Page 125]\n/* REMOVE ITEMS NOT NEEDED IN THE LOOKUP TABLE AND STOP AML IF THE LOOKUP\n/* TABLE IS TO BE FOR THE MASK ONLY; OTHERWISE CONTINUE\n&if not %ag_values% &then\n&do\nq\ndropitem %lut% %lut% count prot_areas tenure forest_type ~\ntopo_features t-code tag\n&return Lookup table completed... excludes land uses assigned by SPREAD\n&end\n/* ADD TO LOOKUP TABLE AGRICULTURAL LAND USES ALLOCATED BY SPREAD\n/* 2.1 Livestock grazing\n/* No class for irrigated native pastures - assign to 4.3 Irrigated\n/* modified pastures\n/* spread_desc = 'Residual/Native pastures'\nresel spread eq 1 and irrigation eq 0\ncalc lu_code = 210\ncalc lu_desc = 'PRODUCTION FROM RELATIVELY NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS'\ncalc lu_desc2 = 'Livestock grazing'\ncalc lu_desc3 = ''\ncalc t-code = '2.1.0'\ncommit\nresel spread eq 1 and irrigation eq 1\ncalc lu_code = 430\ncalc lu_desc = 'PRODUCTION FROM IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE AND PLANTATIONS'\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [Page 131]\n/* Other non-cereal crops (includes flowers and bulbs,\n/* beverage and spice crops, tobacco, woody fodder plants)\n/* spread_desc = 'Other non-cereal crops'\nresel spread eq 11 and irrigation eq 0\ncalc lu_code = 340\ncalc lu_desc = 'PRODUCTION FROM DRYLAND AGRICULTURE AND PLANTATIONS'\ncalc lu_desc2 = 'Cropping'\ncalc lu_desc3 = ''\ncalc t-code = '3.4.0'\ncommit\nresel spread eq 11 and irrigation eq 1\ncalc lu_code = 440\ncalc lu_desc = 'PRODUCTION FROM IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE AND PLANTATIONS'\ncalc lu_desc2 = 'Irrigated cropping'\ncalc lu_desc3 = ''\ncalc t-code = '4.4.0'\ncommit\n/* Unallocated potentially agricultural land.\n/* Assume mainly non-agricultural; intensive uses prominent, especially\n/* rural residential ('hobby farms') in periurban areas and mining in the\n/* La Trobe valley.\n/* spread_desc = 'Unallocated potentially ag. land'\nresel spread eq 0\ncalc lu_code = 500\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [pages 131,133,134]\n_code = 440\ncalc lu_desc = 'PRODUCTION FROM IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE AND PLANTATIONS'\ncalc lu_desc2 = 'Irrigated cropping'\ncalc lu_desc3 = ''\ncalc t-code = '4.4.0'\ncommit\n/* Unallocated potentially agricultural land.\n/* Assume mainly non-agricultural; intensive uses prominent, especially\n/* rural residential ('hobby farms') in periurban areas and mining in the\n/* La Trobe valley.\n/* spread_desc = 'Unallocated potentially ag. land'\nresel spread eq 0\ncalc lu_code = 500\ncalc lu_desc = 'INTENSIVE USES'\ncalc lu_desc2 = ''\ncalc lu_desc3 = ''\ncalc t-code = '5.0.0'\ncommit\n/* REMOVE ITEMS NOT NEEDED IN THE LOOKUP TABLE AND STOP AML\nq\ndropitem %lut% %lut% count prot_areas tenure forest_type topo_features spread ~\nirrigation tag\n&return Lookup table completed... includes land uses assigned by SPREAD\n119\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [Page 3]\nAustralia’s land uses\nThe national land use picture for Australia described here is drawn from national scale mapping completed for 2001/02\n(1:2,500,000).\n Source: `other-pdfs/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf)`\n- Bin\n10 represents probabilities of 0.9 – 1.0\nProbability Crops Pastures\nNLUM Bin t1 t2 t5 t6 t7 t1 t2 t5 t6 t7\n1 33255 33103 41220 36731 30031 516 0 4088 1606 541\n2 6501 6062 2355 3765 7081 452 0 1245 481 228\n3 5330 6943 1439 3153 5822 512 2 984 438 186\n4 3369 6522 1102 2502 4770 933 29 928 529 280\n5 3063 2053 939 1084 2288 1770 402 924 747 983\n6 1234 140 867 614 621 3379 3839 979 1636 3200\n7 815 11 949 486 220 3792 6719 1188 2866 5496\n8 466 0 1028 438 214 6118 6995 1624 3372 5909\n9 499 0 1430 557 237 6726 8760 3502 4557 7930\n10 302 0 3505 1379 436 30636 28088 39372 34477 26967\n5.5 Conclusions\nVerification and accuracy testing of the NLUM SPREAD data has been achieved using\ncatchment scale land-use data (CLUM).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- The loss of sensor sensitivity was\nestimated from an “invariant” target site in the Lybian desert over a three year period (equations 8 and\n9 in \"Revised post-launch calibration of channels 1 and 2 of the Advanced Very High Resolution\nRadiometer on board the NOAA-14 spacecraft\" by Rao and Chen published on the NOAA website at\nhttp://psbsgi1.nesdis.noaa.gov:8080/EBB/ml/niccal1.html).\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- [pages 1,2,3,4]\n[Page 1]\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-\nDarling Basin: 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000\nmaps\nBaseline land use profiles to support the implementation of\nthe basin Salinity Management Strategy\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Outputs for the years 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000\nwere achieved by spatially assigning statistical agricultural census data using the established\nSpatial Reallocation of Aggregated Data (SPREAD) method.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- This project addresses the\nrequirements for baseline land use conditions a 1 January 2000 (Year 2000 map); and\nunderpins understanding of the variability in baseline conditions over the 25 year benchmark\nperiod 1975 – 2000 (Year, 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000 maps plus concorded SLA statistics\n1983-2000)\nThe aims of the current project were to implement the already established SPREAD\nprocedure for mapping the MDB for the required period and also to include the newly\ndeveloped SPREAD II probability mapping.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n\n## Key Issues, Risks, and Recommendations\n\n- [Page 6]\n5.3 Testing Issues – land-use AVHRR-NDVI profiles input to SPREAD..............26\nTest T0 - SPREAD 1 using a limited number of local control site profiles ........26\nTest T1 - SPREAD 2 using a limited number of local control site profiles ........26\nTest T2 – all profiles.........................................................................................26\nTest T4 – increasing the kernel smoother bandwidth.........................................27\nTest T5 – Using average signatures profiles ......................................................27\nTest T6 - using profiles selected from CLUM bin 10 data .................................28\nTest T7 - use of an irrigation mask constraint....................................................29\n5.4 Accuracy of the results....................................................................................29\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- The requirement for regional land use mapping (both historical and current)\nLand use mapping has many applications relevant to national scale issues that include:\n(cid:131) Supporting information on diversity of environment and related patterns in economic use of land (e.g. risk\nassessment of land use with climate reliability projections; relating land use to social factors)\n(cid:131) Strategic industry-based planning\n(cid:131) Integrating with other data sets to allow multi-objective assessment on land use and land use change\n(cid:131) Background information products to inform decision-making and assist in the presentation of policy proposals\nMethod for regional land use mapping\nNational agricultural statistics and time-series satellite NOAA-AVHRR data is being used as a primary input for a\nmethod of generating regional land-use maps across Australia.\n Source: `strategies/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf)`\n- Some primary attribute products derived from the 1996/97 Land Use of Australia data set are provided\non the Australian Natural Resources Atlas at http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/atlas_home.cfm\nRecommendations\nImplications for managing Australia’s natural resources\nIn the management of Australia’s natural resources:\nß The national land use map should be used as a spatial benchmark for land use in Australia circa\n1996.\nß Users should make use of the data set’s flexibilty to modify the land use classification to suit their\npurposes.\nß Users should consider the agricultural land use reliability indicators provided.\nß The data set should be recognised as a source of spatially corrected agricultural commodity area\ndata derived from the 1996/97 AgStats and used as such when the opportunity arises.\nß Use of the 1996/97 Land Use of Australia data set should be encouraged for appropriate purposes\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- 2013\nTowards national reporting on land use change in Australia\n2011\nLandscape in transition: tracking land use change (Science and Economic Insights-Issues 2011.2.2\n)\n2005\nLand use data integration: the Lower Murray NAP region - a report to the National Land & Water Resources Audit, 2005\nPDF [3.3 MB]\nLand use change poster\n* PDF [5.2 MB]\n* Legacy documents (older than 1 July 2010)\nThis legacy document was produced before 1 July 2010 and is available for information only.\n Source: `pages/publications-index.html (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/publications)`\n- Descriptive\ntables depicting the annual areas of commodities based on concorded SLA-based Agricultural\nstatistics for the period 1983 through to 2001 have also been produced\nThe requirement for regional land use mapping (both historical and current)\nLand use mapping has many applications relevant to national scale issues that include:\n• Salinity and Hydrological modelling.\n• Supporting information on diversity of environment and related patterns in economic use\nof land (e.g. risk assessment of land use with climate reliability projections; relating land\nuse to social factors).\n• Strategic industry-based planning.\n• Integrating with other data sets to allow multi-objective assessment on land use and land\nuse change.\n• Background information products to inform decision-making and assist in the\npresentation of policy proposals.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Land use mapping methodology ...........................................................................10\n2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................10\n2.2 Input data........................................................................................................10\nNDVI imagery ..................................................................................................10\nAgStats data......................................................................................................11\nControl sites......................................................................................................12\nTopographic data ..............................................................................................12\nTenure data..............................................................................\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Field control-site AVHRR NDVI signatures for Land-Use categories...................18\n4.1 Control site data -background .........................................................................18\n4.2 Control site AVHRR-NDVI signature profiles ................................................18\nThe problem of noise from mixed land-use .......................................................18\n4.3 Yearly AVHRR-NDVI averages .....................................................................19\nVariation of average profiles within Audit commodity classes ..........................20\nSimilarities between commodity profiles and potential mis-classification due to\nmixing ..............................................................................................................21\n4.4 Climatic differences in NDVI signatures.........................................................22\n5.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Testing and verification of results .........................................................................24\n5.1 Objective ........................................................................................................24\n5.2 TAGALUM discussion on SPREAD initial outputs. .......................................24\nKey issues.........................................................................................................24\nImprovements to land use allocation methods ...................................................25\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-Darling Basin 1993 - 2001 5\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- NDVI signatures for ABS level 3 categories within 4 audit commodity classes\nLand Use Mapping for the Murray-Darling Basin 1993 - 2001 21\nIVDN\nAll cereals excluding rice SOYBEANS\n0.7 PEANUTS\n0.6\n0.5 OTHER FIELD\nBEANS\n0.4 LUPINS\n0.3\n0.2 FIELD PEAS\n0.1\n0 VETCHES\napril june aug oct nov-dec jan mar\nLENTILS\nIVDN\nWHEAT\nOATS\nBARLEY\nGRAIN SORGHUM\nMAIZE\nMILLET\nTRITICALE\nCEREALS FOR\nHAY/SILAGE\nOil seeds\n0.7\n0.6\n0.5\n0.4\n0.3\n0.2\n0.1\n0\napril june aug oc\nn\nt ov-dec jan mar\nIVDN\nStone Fruit\n0.6\n0.5\nCANOLA\n0.4\nSUNFLOWER\n0.3\nOIL POPPIES\n0.2\nSAFFLOWER\n0.1\n0\napril june aug oct nov-dec jan mar\nIVDN\nNECTARINES\nPEACHES\nPLUMS\nAVOCADOS\nMANGOES\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- 1996/97 Land Use of\nAustralia: final report for project BRR5, National Land and Water Resources Audit,\nCanberra, available online http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/atlas_home.cfm\nWalker, P A and Mallawaarachchi, T, 1998. 'Disaggregating agricultural statistics\nusing NOAA-AVHRR NDVI', Remote Sens Environ, 63:112 - 125.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- [Page 45]\nWATER\nWATER Lakes\nWATER Surface\nWATER Wetlands\nNorth Bounding Latitude\n-24.485\nSouth Bounding Latitude\n-37.785\nEast Bounding Longitude\n152.585\nWest Bounding Longitude\n138.475\nBeginning Date\n1993-04\nEnding Date\n2003-08\nProgress\nComplete\nMaintenance and Update Frequency\nAs required\nStored Data Set Format\nDIGITAL ARC/INFO 8.2 under SunOS\nAvailable Format Type\nDIGITAL - ARC/INFO raster\nAccess Constraint\nAccess is unrestricted.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Users of the data should acknowledge the following in any visual or published material: the data set\nwas derived and compiled by the Bureau of Rural Sciences and land uses were derived using the\nCollaborative Australian Protected Areas Database 2000 (Dept of Environment and Heritage), TOPO-\n250K Version 1 (Geoscience Australia, Division of National Mapping), Australian Tenure and Forests\nof Australia 2003 (Bureau of Rural Sciences, National Forest Inventory), Normalised Difference\nVegetation Index data (Dept of Environment and Heritage), agricultural census and survey data\ncollected in 1994, 1997, 1999 and 2001 (Australian Bureau of Statistics) and control site data\n(compiled for the National Land and Water Resources Audit by NSW Agriculture, Victorian Dept of\nNatural Resources and Environment, Queensland Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Primary\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- [pages 45,46]\nx data (Dept of Environment and Heritage), agricultural census and survey data\ncollected in 1994, 1997, 1999 and 2001 (Australian Bureau of Statistics) and control site data\n(compiled for the National Land and Water Resources Audit by NSW Agriculture, Victorian Dept of\nNatural Resources and Environment, Queensland Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Primary\nIndustries and Resources SA, Agriculture Western Australia, Tasmanian Dept of Primary Industries,\nWater and Environment and Northern Territory Dept of Lands, Planning and Environment).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Methodology\nThe 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000 Land Use of the Murray-Darling Basin, Version 2 was\nconstructed using a derivative of the methodology described by Stewart et al, (2001) used to\nconstruct the 1996/97 Land Use of Australia, Version 2, a data set of the National Land and\nWater Resources Audit (the Audit).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n\n## Corporate Values and Operating Culture\n\n- To test the accuracy of the probabilities, these\nvalues were aggregated into bins where bin 1 = 0 - 0.1, bin 2 = 0.1 - 0.2 etc.\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- They have been named prYY_NA\nwhere:\n• YY indicates the map year and is one of 93, 96, 98 or 00;\n• N is a one or two digit integer code for the modelled land use with values ranging from 1\nto 21; and\n• A is a one letter code for the irrigation status of the mapped land use with values being\neither d (dryland) or i (irrigated).\n Source: `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)`\n- Values of relevant layer attribute\nType of agricultural Protected Topographic Tenure Forest type\nland use areas features (tenure) (forest_type)\n(prot_areas) (topo_features)\nPotentially agricultural 0 0 6, 7, 8, 18 or 22 0, 1 or 2\nland\nPotentially agricultural 0 0 6, 7, 8, 18 or 22 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4\nholdings\nWe define ‘agricultural land’ to mean land directly used to produce agricultural commodities, including\nland used for grazing as well as for crops. ‘Agricultural holdings’ is defined as land that belongs to\nagricultural enterprises and includes agricultural land and land not used for agricultural production due\nto forest cover. ‘Potentially’ is used because land classified as potentially agricultural land or as\npotentially agricultural holdings as indicated in Table 3 includes a small amount of non-agricultural\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Pixels that failed the following tests were masked out\n<1.3x(Time-1) and (<1.3x(Time+1) or <1.5x(Time+2))\n< 1.5x(Time-2) and (< 1.3(Time+1) or <1.5x(Time+2))\n- if (Time–1) and (Time–2) were masked out then the following test was applied\n<1.75x(Time+1) or < 2.00x(Time+2)\n- if (Time+1) and (Time+2) were masked out then the following test was applied\n< 1.75x(Time-1) or < 2.00x(Time-2)\nStep 3 – fit a temporal spline to each pixel and calculate values for the masked out points.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Attribute Meaning Layer\nvalue Cell value Not applicable\ncount Number of cells with given value \"\nprot_areas Protected area code Protected areas layer\nprot_areas_desc Protected area description \"\ntopo_features Topographic features code Topographic features\nlayer\ntopo_feat_desc Topographic features description \"\ntenure Tenure code Tenure layer\ntenure_desc Tenure description \"\nforest_type Forest type Forest type layer\nforest_type_desc Forest type description \"\nspread Agricultural commodity code: SPREAD Agricultural\noutput commodities layer\nspread_desc Agricultural commodity description: SPREAD \"\noutput\nirrigation Irrigation status code: SPREAD output Irrigation layer\nirrigation_desc Irrigation status description: SPREAD output \"\nlu_code Land use code: ALUMC Version 4 Land use layer\nlu_desc Land use description: ALUMC Version 4, \"\nprimary land use\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Attributes of the affinity class layer of the land use theme showing values and meanings.\naffinities affinities_desc Meaning\n-999 Non-ag or unalloc pot ag Non-agricultural land or no data; unallocated\nland or no data potentially agricultural land.\n-998 Manual alloc - Potentially agricultural land in two SLAs to\ncommonwealth agency which dryland native pasture (spread = 1 and\ninput irrigation = 0) was allocated manually.a These\ntwo SLAs have no agricultural holdings\naccording to the 1996 - 97 AgStats database.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- Attributes of the pass number class layer of the land use theme showing values and meanings.\npass_no pass_no_desc Meaning\n-999 Non-ag or unalloc pot ag Non-agricultural land or no data; unallocated\nland or no data potentially agricultural land.\n-998 Manual alloc - Potentially agricultural land in two SLAs to\ncommonwealth agency which dryland native pasture (spread = 1 and\ninput irrigation = 0) was allocated manually.a These\ntwo SLAs have no agricultural holdings\naccording to the 1996 - 97 AgStats database.\n Source: `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)`\n- News and media\nFeatured\nABARES Outlook 2026 - a forum to exchange and test ideas\nMedia release\nFarming\n30 October 2025\nTickets are now on sale for ABARES Outlook 2026, the Bureau’s flagship annual conference taking…\nRecord highs as ag, fish and forestry sectors crack $100 billion\nMedia release\nABARES\n02 September 2025\nAustralia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry production is expected to hit a record combined…\nNew data confirms broadacre farmland prices have levelled off\nMedia release\nFarming\n26 March 2025\nBroadacre farmland prices across Australia have continued their plateau for a second straight year…\nLatest\nBroadacre farmland price growth continues but pace slows\nMedia release\nAgriculture\n31 March 2026\nThe pace of growth in Australian broadacre farmland prices is moderating across most farmland types…\nAg lending on rise as farmers re-invest in business\nMedia release\nABARES\n Source: `pages/news-latest.html (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/news)`\n\n## Global Ideas and Case Study Inputs\n\n_No global-intelligence source text found yet. Run `CLAUDE/global-ideas-scraper.py ` to populate case-study sources._\n\n## Source Artifacts Used\n\n- `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf` - strategies - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf\n- `strategies/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf` - strategies - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf\n- `strategies/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127-20-281-29.pdf` - strategies - https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf\n- `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf` - reviews - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf\n- `pages/about.html` - pages - https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/about-aclump\n- `pages/homepage.html` - pages - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/about-aclump\n- `pages/inquiries-index.html` - pages - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/contactus\n- `pages/inquiries-index__00.html` - pages - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/contactus\n- `pages/ministers.html` - pages - https://minister.agriculture.gov.au/\n- `pages/news-latest.html` - pages - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/news\n- `pages/publications-index.html` - pages - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/publications\n- `other-pdfs/Web_ACLUMP_brochure.pdf` - other-pdfs - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_ACLUMP_brochure.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf` - other-pdfs - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/ALUM_Classification_V7_May_2010_summary.pdf` - other-pdfs - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/ALUM_Classification_V7_May_2010_summary.pdf\n- `other-pdfs/NCLUMI_ToR_20250313.pdf` - other-pdfs - http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_ToR_20250313.pdf\n\n## Gaps To Fix\n\n- No corporate plan text source found.\n- No annual report text source found.\n- No global comparison/case-study sources found.", "legislation_md": "# National Committee for Land Use and Management Information - Acts and Legislation Discovery\n\n**Generated at**: 2026-05-09T21:06:59.603527+00:00\n**Entity ID**: B-002166\n**Jurisdiction**: Commonwealth\n**Portfolio**: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry\n\n> This is an evidence-based discovery list from scraped department material. A mention does not always mean the department administers the legislation; high-confidence and official register links should be reviewed.\n\n## Summary\n\n- Source files scanned: 15\n- Unique legislation references found: 0\n\n## Legislation References\n\n_No Act/Regulation/Instrument references found in the local corpus._\n\n## Files Scanned\n\n- `pages/about.html` (page)\n- `pages/homepage.html` (page)\n- `pages/inquiries-index.html` (page)\n- `pages/inquiries-index__00.html` (page)\n- `pages/ministers.html` (page)\n- `pages/news-latest.html` (page)\n- `pages/publications-index.html` (page)\n- `other-pdfs/ALUM_Classification_V7_May_2010_summary.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `other-pdfs/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `other-pdfs/NCLUMI_ToR_20250313.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `other-pdfs/Web_ACLUMP_brochure.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `strategies/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127-20-281-29.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)\n- `strategies/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pages.jsonl` (pdf_pages)", "global_initiatives_md": null, "strategy": { "reporting_period": "2024-25", "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26", "vision": "ACLUMP’s geospatial data products for land use, land cover and land management practices, are well-known, trusted and used to inform decisions that impact Australia’s economic, environmental and social prosperity.", "vision_source_page": 1, "purposes": "To provide leadership and strategic direction to the development of integrated land information and mapping built on complementary national and state approaches through the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP).", "purposes_source_page": 1, "how_we_deliver": "National collaborative network ready to mobilise resources; Provide coordinated national technical advice; Facilitate access to our land information; Facilitate capability development; Encourage and facilitate development of new partnerships between land information providers, users and coordinators.", "how_we_deliver_source_page": 1, "government_priorities": [ { "text": "National framework for integrated land information and mapping program", "source_page": 1 }, { "text": "Land information that meets policy, management needs", "source_page": 1 }, { "text": "National, regional and industry stakeholders use our land information", "source_page": 1 }, { "text": "Cooperation and capacity for land information collation, mapping and analysis is increased", "source_page": 1 }, { "text": "New partnerships and technologies are explored for land information", "source_page": 1 } ], "outcomes": [ { "name": "Outcome 1: National framework for integrated land information and mapping program", "description": "The Australian Land Use and Management Classification continues to evolve in response to user needs.", "key_activities": [ "National guidelines for a consistent approach to land use mapping", "National standards" ], "source_page": 1 }, { "name": "Outcome 2: Land use mapping is comprehensive, accurate, current and at an appropriate scale", "description": "Land use mapping is comprehensive, accurate, current and at an appropriate scale.", "key_activities": [ "Field apps, web apps and ‘Land use live’ tools are used by stakeholders", "Technical workshops held" ], "source_page": 1 }, { "name": "Outcome 3: Geospatial data is available as web services", "description": "Geospatial data is available as web services stakeholders for data provision.", "key_activities": [ "Agreements established with stakeholders for data provision" ], "source_page": 1 }, { "name": "Outcome 4: New partnerships established", "description": "New partnerships established.", "key_activities": [ "New methods and technologies incorporated in national standards" ], "source_page": 1 } ], "values": [ "Leadership", "Collaboration", "Innovation", "Integrity" ], "values_framework_name": "NCLUMI Values", "kpi_targets_2025_26": [ { "code": "LUMI01", "measure": "Number of national standards developed", "target": "5", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "LUMI02", "measure": "Number of technical workshops held", "target": "3", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "LUMI03", "measure": "Number of new partnerships established", "target": "2", "source_page": 1 } ], "kpi_results_2024_25": [ { "code": "LUMI01", "measure": "Number of national standards developed", "result": "4", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "LUMI02", "measure": "Number of technical workshops held", "result": "2", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "LUMI03", "measure": "Number of new partnerships established", "result": "1", "status": "Not achieved", "source_page": 1 } ], "_source_urls": { "annual_report_url": "", "corporate_plan_url": "" } }, "ideas": [ { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "small", "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners", "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.", "quote": "Users of the data should acknowledge the following in any visual or published material: the data set\nwas derived and compiled by the Bureau of Rural Sciences and land uses were derived using the\nCollaborative Australian Protected Areas Database 2000 (Dept of Environment and Heritage), TOPO-\n250K Version 1 (Geoscience Australia, Division of National Mapping), Australian Tenure and Forests\nof Australia 2003 (Bureau of Rural Sciences, National Forest Inventory), Normalised Difference\nVegetation Index data (Dept of Environment and Heritage), agricultural census and survey data\ncollected in 1994, 1997, 1999 and 2001 (Australian Bureau of Statistics) and control site data\n(compiled for the National Land and Water Resources Audit by NSW Agriculture, Victorian Dept of\nNatural Resources and Environment, Queensland Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Primary", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "large", "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact", "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "Users of the data should acknowledge the following in any visual or published material: the data set\nwas derived and compiled by the Bureau of Rural Sciences and land uses were derived using the\nCollaborative Australian Protected Areas Database 2000 (Dept of Environment and Heritage), TOPO-\n250K Version 1 (Geoscience Australia, Division of National Mapping), Australian Tenure and Forests\nof Australia 2003 (Bureau of Rural Sciences, National Forest Inventory), Normalised Difference\nVegetation Index data (Dept of Environment and Heritage), agricultural census and survey data\ncollected in 1994, 1997, 1999 and 2001 (Australian Bureau of Statistics) and control site data\n(compiled for the National Land and Water Resources Audit by NSW Agriculture, Victorian Dept of\nNatural Resources and Environment, Queensland Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Primary", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "small", "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries", "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.", "quote": "1996/97 Land Use of\nAustralia: final report for project BRR5, National Land and Water Resources Audit,\nCanberra, available online http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/atlas_home.cfm\nWalker, P A and Mallawaarachchi, T, 1998. 'Disaggregating agricultural statistics\nusing NOAA-AVHRR NDVI', Remote Sens Environ, 63:112 - 125.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "large", "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system", "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.", "quote": "1996/97 Land Use of\nAustralia: final report for project BRR5, National Land and Water Resources Audit,\nCanberra, available online http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/atlas_home.cfm\nWalker, P A and Mallawaarachchi, T, 1998. 'Disaggregating agricultural statistics\nusing NOAA-AVHRR NDVI', Remote Sens Environ, 63:112 - 125.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "small", "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases", "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.", "quote": "This project addresses the\nrequirements for baseline land use conditions a 1 January 2000 (Year 2000 map); and\nunderpins understanding of the variability in baseline conditions over the 25 year benchmark\nperiod 1975 – 2000 (Year, 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000 maps plus concorded SLA statistics\n1983-2000)\nThe aims of the current project were to implement the already established SPREAD\nprocedure for mapping the MDB for the required period and also to include the newly\ndeveloped SPREAD II probability mapping.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "large", "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments", "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "This project addresses the\nrequirements for baseline land use conditions a 1 January 2000 (Year 2000 map); and\nunderpins understanding of the variability in baseline conditions over the 25 year benchmark\nperiod 1975 – 2000 (Year, 1993, 1996, 1998 and 2000 maps plus concorded SLA statistics\n1983-2000)\nThe aims of the current project were to implement the already established SPREAD\nprocedure for mapping the MDB for the required period and also to include the newly\ndeveloped SPREAD II probability mapping.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "small", "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates", "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.", "quote": "[Page 45]\nWATER\nWATER Lakes\nWATER Surface\nWATER Wetlands\nNorth Bounding Latitude\n-24.485\nSouth Bounding Latitude\n-37.785\nEast Bounding Longitude\n152.585\nWest Bounding Longitude\n138.475\nBeginning Date\n1993-04\nEnding Date\n2003-08\nProgress\nComplete\nMaintenance and Update Frequency\nAs required\nStored Data Set Format\nDIGITAL ARC/INFO 8.2 under SunOS\nAvailable Format Type\nDIGITAL - ARC/INFO raster\nAccess Constraint\nAccess is unrestricted.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "large", "title": "Single front door for life-event based services", "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.", "quote": "[Page 45]\nWATER\nWATER Lakes\nWATER Surface\nWATER Wetlands\nNorth Bounding Latitude\n-24.485\nSouth Bounding Latitude\n-37.785\nEast Bounding Longitude\n152.585\nWest Bounding Longitude\n138.475\nBeginning Date\n1993-04\nEnding Date\n2003-08\nProgress\nComplete\nMaintenance and Update Frequency\nAs required\nStored Data Set Format\nDIGITAL ARC/INFO 8.2 under SunOS\nAvailable Format Type\nDIGITAL - ARC/INFO raster\nAccess Constraint\nAccess is unrestricted.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "small", "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases", "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.", "quote": "Descriptive\ntables depicting the annual areas of commodities based on concorded SLA-based Agricultural\nstatistics for the period 1983 through to 2001 have also been produced\nThe requirement for regional land use mapping (both historical and current)\nLand use mapping has many applications relevant to national scale issues that include:\n• Salinity and Hydrological modelling.\n• Supporting information on diversity of environment and related patterns in economic use\nof land (e.g. risk assessment of land use with climate reliability projections; relating land\nuse to social factors).\n• Strategic industry-based planning.\n• Integrating with other data sets to allow multi-objective assessment on land use and land\nuse change.\n• Background information products to inform decision-making and assist in the\npresentation of policy proposals.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "large", "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign", "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.", "quote": "Descriptive\ntables depicting the annual areas of commodities based on concorded SLA-based Agricultural\nstatistics for the period 1983 through to 2001 have also been produced\nThe requirement for regional land use mapping (both historical and current)\nLand use mapping has many applications relevant to national scale issues that include:\n• Salinity and Hydrological modelling.\n• Supporting information on diversity of environment and related patterns in economic use\nof land (e.g. risk assessment of land use with climate reliability projections; relating land\nuse to social factors).\n• Strategic industry-based planning.\n• Integrating with other data sets to allow multi-objective assessment on land use and land\nuse change.\n• Background information products to inform decision-making and assist in the\npresentation of policy proposals.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Staff Productivity", "scale": "small", "title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents", "idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.", "quote": "For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives", "source": "reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Sensitive information leakage", "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "category": "Staff Productivity", "scale": "large", "title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform", "idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.", "quote": "For a revision based on the proposed 2000–2001 agricultural census, collection of appropriate ground\ncontrol data could cost $500 000, data licensing could be $10 000, and staff time and computing time\ncould be an extra $200 000.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives", "source": "reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf (http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Sensitive information leakage", "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts" ] } ], "legislation_administered": [], "artifacts": [ { "category": "strategies", "year": "2024", "url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "file": "strategies/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127-20-281-29.pdf", "bytes": 386690, "link_text": "Strategic Plan 2024-2029" }, { "category": "strategies", "year": "2000", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LUMapping%20for%20the%20MDB.pdf", "file": "strategies/Web_LUMapping-20for-20the-20MDB.pdf", "bytes": 2201176, "link_text": "Land Use Mapping for the Murray-Darling Basin: 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000 maps. Baseline land use profiles to support the implementation of the basin Salinity Manag" }, { "category": "strategies", "year": "2003", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf", "file": "strategies/Web_SPREADII_Tech_Bulletin.pdf", "bytes": 150819, "link_text": "Technical Bulletin: Regional Land Use Mapping using Satellite AVHRR Data, 2003" }, { "category": "reviews", "year": "2019", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_LU%20of%20Australia%201996_97.pdf", "file": "reviews/Web_LU-20of-20Australia-201996_97.pdf", "bytes": 8934044, "link_text": "1996-97 (Version 2) Land Use of Australia - Final Report for Project BRR5, 2001" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2025", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_ToR_20250313.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/NCLUMI_ToR_20250313.pdf", "bytes": 199976, "link_text": "Terms of Reference" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Web_ACLUMP_brochure.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/Web_ACLUMP_brochure.pdf", "bytes": 763986, "link_text": "ACLUMP Brochure" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2006", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/Land_use_in_Australia_at_a_glance_2006.pdf", "bytes": 905898, "link_text": "Land Use in Australia at a Glance" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2010", "url": "http://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/ALUM_Classification_V7_May_2010_summary.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/ALUM_Classification_V7_May_2010_summary.pdf", "bytes": 16856, "link_text": "The Australian land use and management (ALUM) classification version 7 summary" } ], "_meta": { "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-13T11:02:55+00:00", "strategy_brief_meta": { "model": "nova-micro", "folder": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "annual_report": { "file": null, "url": "", "year": null }, "corporate_plan": { "file": "strategies\\NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127-20-281-29.txt", "url": "https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127%20%281%29.pdf", "year": "NCLUMI_Strategic_Plan_2024-2029_APPROVED_20241127-20-281-29" }, "usage": { "input_tokens": 1785, "output_tokens": 994, "total_tokens": 2779, "model": "nova-micro" }, "cost_usd": 0.00020163500000000003, "elapsed_seconds": 28.22, "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:18:08+00:00" }, "ideas_manifest": { "entity_id": "B-002166", "entity_name": "National Committee for Land Use and Management Information", "folder_name": "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information", "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:30.628422+00:00", "idea_count": 12, "markdown": "ideas/National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information_ideas.md", "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl", "inputs": [ "National-Committee-for-Land-Use-and-Management-Information_strategy-overview.md", "strategy-evidence.json", "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json" ] }, "global_intel_meta": null } }