SET01

Deliver advice on the role of enabling infrastructure, key challenges and priority opportunities for IA to add value at a national level – informed by engagement with 100% of state and territory governments

Over the life of the plan

—

SET02

Track and report on market capacity to deliver energy enabling infrastructure, including constraints and opportunities to build industry capacity, through an annual market capacity report and advice to government

Annually

—

SHG01

Undertake a post completion evaluation on the historical impact of transport projects in supporting housing outcomes

2025-26

—

SHG02

Identify in our evaluation of infrastructure business cases how proposals will facilitate housing outcomes

Over the life of the plan

—

SHG03

Track and report on market capacity to deliver against national housing targets, including constraints and opportunities to build industry capacity, through an annual market capacity report and advice to government

Annually

—

EMRIN01

Conduct audits to assess how national infrastructure networks are performing to inform development of IA's advice on priority areas for Australian Government infrastructure investment

Over the life of the Plan

—

EMRIN02

Develop enhanced guidance on how proposals can better value resilience

2026-27

—

EMRIN03

Undertake a post completion evaluation on the historical impact of infrastructure projects to improve the resilience of critical networks

2026-27

—

EMRIN04

Identify and report opportunities to leverage emerging industry capabilities to strengthen infrastructure networks and identify strategies to remove any impediments identified, through an annual market capacity report and advice to government

Annually

—

DM01

A Post Completion Evaluation Framework is published in consultation with DITRDCSA and jurisdictions to drive data sharing, lessons learned and potential enhancements to project selection, assessment methodologies and reporting

2025-26

—

DM02

The Infrastructure Priority List is targeted and updated regularly, with all proposals aligned to Australian Government priorities

Over the life of the plan

—

DM03

A National Planning and Assessment Framework is developed, with implementation demonstrating progress toward national consistency and reduced duplication

Over the life of the plan

—

DM04

Project evaluations leverage a 'peer review' model where appropriate state or territory assurance outputs exist, promoting greater efficiency in the project evaluation model

Over the life of the plan

—

DM05

Staff survey results show an alignment and engagement score in the top 10% of all other organisations surveyed

Annually

—

DM06

75% of proponents surveyed are satisfied or highly satisfied with the level of engagement provided in the assessment of their proposal

Annually

—

DM07

IA delivers 100% of products required under the IA Act and Statement of Expectations within statutory timeframes

Over the life of the Plan

—

DM08

80% of Australian Government stakeholders surveyed are satisfied or highly satisfied with the quality and rigour of Infrastructure Australia's advice

Annually

—

R01

New products under the revised Infrastructure Act are delivered within statutory timeframes

—

All products delivered within statutory timeframes

R02

Infrastructure Australia's Corporate Plan and strategic goals are reviewed and (where appropriate) revised within 12 months following the appointment of permanent Commissioners

—

New strategic goals approved by Commissioners in June 2025

R03

75% of stakeholders surveyed are satisfied or highly satisfied with the quality and rigour of Infrastructure Australia's advice

—

96% of stakeholders were satisfied or highly satisfied

R04

50% of Infrastructure Priority List proposals receive Commonwealth Government funding

—

43% received Commonwealth funding. Whilst IA offers advice on priorities it does not make funding decisions

R05

100% of Infrastructure Australia's evaluations of business cases are tabled in parliament and published on our website within statutory timelines

—

All evaluations of business cases tabled and published on our website within required timeframes

R06

75% of stakeholders surveyed are satisfied or highly satisfied with the quality of Infrastructure Australia's stakeholder engagement

—

96% of stakeholders surveyed were satisfied or highly satisfied with the quality of engagement

R07

75% of proponents surveyed are satisfied or highly satisfied with the level of engagement and quality of advice provided in the assessment of their proposal

—

Engagement - 82%; Quality of advice – 70%. Whilst below target we note the sample size was small at 10 responses

R08

100% of states & territories contribute to developing the National Planning and Assessment Framework (NPAF) and the ongoing plan to harmonise project development practices

—

100% of states and territories have been engaged to date on the NPAF development – NPAF development is ongoing

R09

At least 80% of eligible project evaluations leverage a 'peer review' model where appropriate state or territory assurance outputs exist

—

100% of eligible project evaluations have leveraged a peer review model where appropriate assurance outputs existed

R10

75% of relevant stakeholders surveyed are satisfied or highly satisfied with the market capacity report

—

94% of stakeholders satisfied or highly satisfied with the market capacity report (100% among federal government stakeholders)

R11

Maintenance of trust as an independent national agency, as measured by maintaining data sharing agreements with all State, Territory and Commonwealth governments

—

IA has maintained data sharing agreements with 100% of state, territory and Commonwealth governments

R12

Staff survey results show an alignment and engagement score in the top 10% of all other organisations surveyed

—

Survey results were in the top 10% of organisations surveyed for alignment and engagement

R13

Staff survey results show IT & systems scores in the top 10% of all other organisations surveyed

—

Survey results were in the top 10% of organisations surveyed for IT and systems

R14

At least 50% of proposals identify approaches to reduce or mitigate emissions in construction and operations

—

70% of proposals identify approaches to reduce or mitigate emissions

R15

Establish a baseline and a reduction strategy to 2023 for greenhouse gas emissions associated with how we work at Infrastructure Australia

—

Baseline set at 2023-24 levels. In 2024-25 emissions have reduced overall

R16

The infrastructure sector accounts for its contribution to Australia's emissions reduction target of 43% by 2030

—

3.5% reduction over 2005 measure (2023 Total 349.7 Mt CO2e)

R17

The infrastructure sector's emissions are net-zero no later than 2050

—

1.4% reduction over 2021

R18

Consult with 100% of states and territories in developing enhanced guidance for assessing productivity and liveability in infrastructure proposals

—

N/A as development of such guidance has not yet commenced

R19

100% of jurisdictions have 10-year pipelines for projects and concessions over $20 million

—

62.5% of jurisdictions have 10-year pipelines. Whilst we can contribute to this measure, we are unable to control the outcome

R20

Develop an appropriate baseline and seek to improve over time, the Multifactor Productivity Metric for construction sector productivity

—

ABS Multifactor Productivity Metric for construction sector +2.0, (up from -0.8 last year)